barsquid

You are correct but SCOTUS has zero respect for the Constitution when they're paid not to, so who knows?

Looking forward to when GEO Group v. State of California reaches an outrageously corrupt SCOTUS.

It's still legal to have punitive slavery. There is a carve out in the amendment. It is repugnant. We need a 28th amendment declaring an end to all slavery.

People know how to do that, but why not just leave instead?

I came here knowing what I would see, with a bunch of upvotes to hand out.

I think this is the context: https://www.factcheck.org/2020/03/trump-and-the-new-hoax/

I'm down to criticize him for saying it, regardless of if he presented a halfass correction or not. He refused to wear a mask, which his cult took as an example. He encouraged his cult to completely defy any attempt at public health measures as well.

Like we could ask Uncommitted what they think? Or is it only specific people we should listen to?

Lol this fucking oligarchy. Of course the US government is protecting corporations against losing money from their own economic risk-taking.

You'd be blasting the laborers, though. The person responsible is at home doing zero work.

In time? In hue, you mean.

I have no idea why companies ever accepted net 30, let alone to the extent that it has become a sort of standard. I'd have the business owner as the guarantor at a minimum. Better yet, if they're good for the payment, they can get a bank loan.

That is correct.