[email protected] is already a thing brah.
Personally I'd be fine with allowing it in bios only. If people want to see more, they'll check out the bio, and see the link there. In other cases someone will just be like "... Nice." without feeling advertised to.
In the end, it's all about the rules the community itself puts up. Personally, I get more enjoyment out of fewer "real" (imperfect/amateur) out-of-love quality, than more perfect/fitgirl for-profit quantity. But I'm aware this is generally a minority opinion.
Thanks, added as a sticky in the lemmit community.
Ideally I want to have this done automatically.
I'm not sure what you mean, do you have a link and/or screenshot? If it only happens in a specific client, it's probably an issue with that client.
Cheers, ~~both~~ all three of you. We're off to a beautiful federated future.
Congrats on reaching this set of sane rules. The efforts of creating an admin community behind the scenes are really starting to show off.
Request for clarification for uhmm, a friend of mine: When someone creates that own instance, with blackjack and hookers, and one of your users subscribes to a community there, it will synchronise part of that content to lemmynsfw. What will you do then?
I'd like to remind you that some beautiful maniacs can be quite reasonable ;)
Yeah, I've upped the limit on this server, so it should come through now if you retry.
Could you give an example post of what you mean? Every Post starts with "The original was posted on /r/blabla
", in which the latter links to the original, old.reddit.com link, will that work for you?
OMG, That did it!
Can't believe I hadn't tried that myself! (well, or that nobody else suggested it in that github issue).
I won't be applying that patch, because I don't really want to mess with the deployment system, but I did leave a list of current NSFW communities in the comments.
Apologies for the late reply, here's a list of the current NSFW subs on the server. I'm not quite sure on how to keep this list up to date automatically, but I'll figure something out.
{
"nsfw_communities": [
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])",
"[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])"
],
"all_count": 409,
"nsfw_count": 68
}
That could work, but it would be terrible for discoverability. In the mean time, I put up a feature request at Lemmy. I'm not a fan of pushing my problems upstream, but in this case it would actually be the easiest solution - as far as I can see (and I have 0 experience with Rust) they only need to adjust the validation regex, because the database already allows for it. That is - as long as the ActivityPub protocol allows for it.
If they deny it, I could try something with name mapping, but you'd either end up with something that is unreadable, or something with a high collision chance. Neither option is very appealing. For now I'm just going to wait and see.
I could, but I'm afraid that would lead to even more people who don't realize they're looking at copied content. I get enough messages from people who misunderstand the bot as it is :/