Resonosity

joined 1 year ago
[–] Resonosity -2 points 3 weeks ago

Dems are chasing Repubs, so either party winning won't really change this fact.

With Dems we're delaying this outcome. With Repubs we're accelerating it.

[–] Resonosity 7 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you for bringing attention to the incompetence of Kamala's campaign. She and her campaign at one point even had to silence Tim Walz for his believes because they went against the platform.

Then the race after Republicans by uniting with the Cheneys just cucked them so hard.

Tim Walz was the key to this campaign's victory. And Kamala dropped the ball.

[–] Resonosity 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (8 children)

Edit: If Kamala loses, and it looks like she might, I'm blaming her and her campaign. She could have swooned the beliefs of America if she had ran on something better.

Her political skills are trash.

Kamala gained the most approved points after Biden gave her the race.

Since then, her approval rating has plummeted compared to her early numbers, and I think this is because Kamala doesn't really know what to believe.

You can see it with Tim Walz. There was a lot of momentum when Kamala took up the mantle, and that momentum was carried through once the Walz pick came out. Then, around the DNC, the campaign's tone shifted, crawling back to the ethos of the Biden administration. I think this is because Kamala couldn't decide to break away from Biden or not, and because she waited so long, she was around a lot of the same people in the Biden administration, and those people influenced her platform. You can also see this with marijuana and how she changed sides in her time between being DA and senator. Also, how she didn't really have a solid platform to begin with, which should have been established right when Walz was picked.

I'm not here to call her out as a flip flopper. I'm pointing to how she could have steamrolled this election, but chose not to. It saddened me so much when the campaign had silence Tim for his views and policies when those views and policies were the key to victory.

[–] Resonosity 3 points 3 weeks ago

I mean, you're right.

The fact that one of the major tauted policies of Harris' campaign was a border wall, something that Trump exclusively brought to the table in 2016, is just one example of our government racheting more and more conservative over time. Democrats used to at least advocate for America being a land of immigrants.

Really hope Harris doesn't run in 2028 if she wins 2024. We need a Democratic primary where Americans can choose those in the party who represent more progressive values than the establishment.

[–] Resonosity 5 points 3 weeks ago

Climate? Fucked. Safety? Fucked.

[–] Resonosity 4 points 1 month ago

Both institutional Democrat and Conservative parties are towards the right side of the spectrum, yes.

The Democrats doing this is entirely their fault though. There are a number of issues where people actually skew left if the framing is set up in a certain way. The fact that they're chasing the GOP will likely blow up in their face when they lose support from their supposed "own" base because the party fails to represent them. The establishment Dems don't represent the views of Bernie or AOC, for instance, and those candidates best align with my current views.

If Dems end up losing, it's because they didn't recognize the potential to seize their own destiny. The same's been true since 2016.

[–] Resonosity 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Fairphone 5 can do that, and even give you choice over your RAM.

Although the phone isn't sold in the US, it will work the best on T-Mobile since the Fairphone 5's chipset best aligns with those frequencies (sorry for the reddit post).

Would've been my first phone after my previous 7 year old Galaxy Note9, but it incurred water damage. Definitely considering it still though even with my new phone lease because of the Fairphone 5 being unlocked

[–] Resonosity 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Everyone, except Palestine and Lebanon

[–] Resonosity 1 points 1 month ago

Lemming, chill

[–] Resonosity 2 points 1 month ago
[–] Resonosity 2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I've been using Original Commenter (OC) to talk about the person who starts a comment thread. Seems to be pretty intuitive. Wonder what the acronym would be for commenters responding to OC and starting different comment branches. Probably makes sense to just use their name

[–] Resonosity 2 points 1 month ago

The US is bipartisan when it comes to Israeli support because Democrats haven't broken from that bipartisan tradition.

Once Democrats do, it is no longer bipartisan.

I don't expect Conservatives to do this given what you've said, so Democrats foot the bill.

Biden has in fact already called for the cease of arms transfers, but that policy goes into effect after the election finishes. If Biden can call for it after the election, he can call for it today.

There is no reason why the Commander in Chief cannot outlaw the transfer of weapons and ammunition to Israel. We've already broken one of our laws that prevents this.

view more: ‹ prev next ›