Necronomicommunist

joined 1 year ago
[–] Necronomicommunist 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah, he has the right, sure. Nobody says he doesn't, nobody says he shouldn't. But right now it's in the media. It's stupid. Now there's more attention drawn to this, and if they lose (though Elon's musk will likely try to bleed them dry rather than try to straight up win) it's now not just a claim, it's a claim backed up by law. He has very little to gain with this stunt.

[–] Necronomicommunist 10 points 1 year ago (13 children)

You think worms are insects?

[–] Necronomicommunist 4 points 1 year ago

Cool, then don't.

[–] Necronomicommunist 23 points 1 year ago

And nothing of value was lost

[–] Necronomicommunist 2 points 1 year ago

People using "honesty" as a veneer to be brutal aren't the same as people that are genuinely honest.

[–] Necronomicommunist 1 points 1 year ago

Wefwef/liftoff actually! Kept getting errors and refreshing didn't show anything. Thanks for the heads up

[–] Necronomicommunist 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Nobody here wants everything with rubber wheels banned. We just want cars to be a form of personal transport to be the lowest prioritized compared to other forms like buses, trains, etc.

[–] Necronomicommunist 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're talking about having family photos pirated, there's a privacy issue, not a property issue. Everyone talking about media in privacy talks about distributable media. If you want to include other things, that's on you, but you'll be yapping in the void as that isn't what the conversation is about. Not secrets, or private documents.

As for the term of taking, it's clear what taking means when you try to erroneously conflate piracy with stealing. It doesn't mean the same as taking a shit either, it has nothing to do with personal definitions, merely the accepted definitions when talking about either piracy, or stealing.

view more: ‹ prev next ›