Hawke

joined 2 years ago
[–] Hawke 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yes. The only case I can think of where I might say “for me” in one of those is talking about an inevitable future event where I have no real choice.

e.g. if I only have beans in my cupboard, I might reasonably say “it looks like beans for me [for supper tonight]”. Or if I am sure I will die soon, “it seems like the end for me.”

[–] Hawke 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I would never use “for me” in any of those phrases.

[–] Hawke 6 points 2 years ago
[–] Hawke 5 points 2 years ago

Don’t look up.

[–] Hawke 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Whoa, a bot actually posting something useful and interesting!

[–] Hawke 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

That seems more appropriate to me.

[–] Hawke 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hmm. I think there’s no point in a “daily discussion thread” until there’s enough critical mass to actually have a daily discussion.

Assuming the bot would post this every day it just makes the community feel like a ghost town.

[–] Hawke -1 points 2 years ago
[–] Hawke 1 points 2 years ago

I have only wikipedia to refer to here but “The replacement tyres flown in, which were of the type used in the Spanish Grand Prix earlier that year, turned out to have the same problem when tested.”

So … sounds to me like they’d have failed too.

We certainly could say that Bridgestone supplied bad tyres to 2010 Canada, why not?

[–] Hawke 2 points 2 years ago

I assume that since it’s reported by the BBC that it’s the UK ministry of defence? Odd that no country is mentioned.

[–] Hawke -1 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Wow an even more useless bot post than the usual fare.

[–] Hawke 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes you need content, but without the discussion the content is just a firehose of random garbage.

view more: ‹ prev next ›