Bluefalcon

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Simple, which candidate is more likely to stop the Israelis in the middle east? Trump or Harris?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Who? Obama? Or MLK jr?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Password1234 .....We're In!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

He will receive plenty of treatment on the tax payers in jail. Have fun buddy, maybe you can remark "The Longest Yard" for the third time

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 days ago

What? Trump inciting violence with known lies? I have never heard of such a lie. He is a saint. Saint Trump!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

They should ask RFK jr what he thinks about dog eating.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I would split east and west Texas first. Use the Trinity river as a natural divider.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Puerto Rico swings back and forth on wanting statehood. Guam?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (4 children)

What more does Trump need? You are either MLK jr or Obama.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (6 children)

That's pretty accurate. He is twice as big and acting crazy from the roids. Plus, most roid users are complete assholes.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Not sure about two but Washington D.C. should have statehood.

 

Didn't take companies long to stop pretending like they care. We are fucked.

 

This would be a quick way to see of it's racist, close minded, or just straight bs.

Ex1- You want women to kill babies, boy!

Ex2- You want to feed the homeless, boy!

5
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

"Until sentence is imposed, all individuals covered by Paragraph (b)" -- referring to members of the court staff, the district attorney's staff and their families -- "must continue to perform their lawful duties free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm," Merchan wrote in the ruling.

And although he struck the portion of the gag order pertaining to jurors, Merchan wrote that it would be his "strong preference" to extend those protections because there remains "ample evidence to justify continued concern for the jurors."

Someone help make sense of this. Why would you lift the gag order off jurors but not yourself?

87
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by [email protected] to c/news
 

"Until sentence is imposed, all individuals covered by Paragraph (b)" -- referring to members of the court staff, the district attorney's staff and their families -- "must continue to perform their lawful duties free from threats, intimidation, harassment, and harm," Merchan wrote in the ruling.

And although he struck the portion of the gag order pertaining to jurors, Merchan wrote that it would be his "strong preference" to extend those protections because there remains "ample evidence to justify continued concern for the jurors."

Someone help make sense of this. Why would you lift the gag order off jurors but not yourself?

view more: ‹ prev next ›