https://perchance.org/beautiful-people
When I first entered Perchance I duplicated the t2i, then realized naming artists was important and, on my second generator got a list of 800+ artists and also got out of t2i so I could control things more finely. Then, to sift the 800+ artists for those with styles I like, I made Love and Light which, while clunky compared to Beautiful-People, does, if one gives dislikes and likes on the 4th and 5th images, eventually synthesize those 800+ artists in to just favs. Finally with 'artist combos' that look good, I started saving them to my own 'fav artistlist list' and, with that, made Beautiful-People.
And people do look good.
Also spiritually I understand Bhakti, where a believer focuses on Lakshmi (or whoever) to become them. Or in Christianity how one would focus on Jesus to become Christlike. Similarly with images of people. So I inherently don't sexualize people and I only give them positive characteristics. I basically surround myself with good romodels. Beautiful-People reflects this.
Also I initially started a version of Love and Light to collect Landscape artists but did not get very far in. So Beautiful-People is specialized in People and for landscapes is nonideal.
After the huge complexity of my previous generators, I wanted something that would FEEL good and be basically 'click button get beautiful images' so it is centered around this concept.
Eventually I upgraded my plugin for the prompt box with tons of libraries with customizeable names and colors. I also believe the best tools are fully customizeable by the wearer and may be made to be fully aligned with their own unique energy.
If you want to see a huge mass of interweaving perchancescript for prompts, touch the edit button. Also alot is built on my own plugins and objects. I have toyed with the idea of making a nice duplicateable framework like t2i. But Beautiful-People is not that. It is duplicateable, but I made it powerfully instead of to be easily built on by others. The artistcombos also are 'my fav artists' in the ratios i like because of how Love and Light works (and more artistcombos, which are more and more tuned, enter daily). This means the images Beautiful-People generates a year from now will be higher quality than the ones generated today. I believe in Growth, Scaling, and that learning to play the strongest lategame champion is the best strategy because then one only needs to learn how to survive to lategame and they become one of the top players in the game. So generators structured to scale up over time are basically where it's at, according to me, allo.
have a great day all :)
next things coming on Beautiful-People:
- fey option
- customizeable generation buttons for people to make their own styles like i do
things i want or need:
- StableDiffusion XL
- StableDiffusion 3
- Upscaling
- Inpainting
- the gallery background to be black instead of white. i did try styling it but scrolling reverts styling to white.
edit: now with Meow button
The Meow button shows as an M in the lower right of generated images. This takes you to the Meow screen where you can mess with this specific picture. Most recently I got this nice but doubleeared pony.
so i touched the M button, generated, and got other versions of her that were better.
Now with this M button, all those pictures that just have something wrong with them even tho they have a great part are salvageable. Hard to overstate how cool this is.
I also like this pony but she has two horns.
so i hit the m button and typed 'one horn' at the end of the prompt
she is even facing a different direction now, but notice how it is the same pony with one horn.
4/8/24 now with customizeable prompt buttons
3Tho I do not think this is one of those areas.
Long ago I actually made a generator that was based off this concept of same seed = same image. After a decently long build time, it turned out that same seed does NOT equal same image and was an unforseen wrecking of that design concept; not just unforseen, but I had read this same sentence I am highlighting now and it is specifically this sentence that made it sound good to go but as an unexpected failure with wasted effort.
It can be explained to newbies without causing harm. But right now it isn't 'ommitting nonessential info'. It is portraying something incorrectly and, if anyone uses the info for a generator using the concept of Same Seed = Same Image, they get pwned by the statement having been unexpectedly false.
I do not know anywhere else in Perchance where something stated as true is actually false and if you use that info assuming it's true you get pwned.