this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
325 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19149 readers
3602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 11 months ago (2 children)

ACAB.

I don't care if "not all cops, tho." They know about this shit, and they don't do anything about it. They're supposed to (in theory) prevent illegality, and yet this stuff gets a pass.

It's no wonder Fundigelicals are bosom buddies, because they do the same thing with religion.

[–] ericisshort 8 points 11 months ago

They always say “it’s just a few bad apples” and conveniently forget the point of the analogy is that the bad apples spoil the whole bunch. So until the little piggies remove ALL of the bad apples, ACAB is 100% correct.

[–] teamevil 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think there are two things that need to happen to get this bullshit under control...first of all defang the police union...you can't function as a union busting group and get the protection of a union that's hypocritical bullshit. No more gypsy cops moving from force to force without their sins following them.

Second, a citizen review board that is made up of anonymous citizens called to serve like jury duty. The review board gets to make disciplinary decisions on police misconduct and it's 100% binding. No more some are more equal than others, or their dumbass "civilian" mind set... they're civilians too.

[–] Zippy 4 points 11 months ago

Union for me, not for thee.

[–] JoJoGAH 7 points 11 months ago

All the more reason we need to #stopcopcity

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Police exist to protect the interests of capital owners. Not your constitutional "rights".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

read this, ask yourself "why would police be against body cameras?" and realize that it's because they think their job entails constantly and knowingly breaking the law.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

So? The Constitution ONLY matters if I'm using it to defend a School Shooter!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

i love the government so much :)))

Hoping at least ONE undue search warrant that results from this garners a big fat lawsuit

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

And this is different from how my taxes are spent why?