this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
361 points (99.2% liked)

politics

19149 readers
3602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 49 points 11 months ago (2 children)

this is good because now:

  1. these people now know that there will be consequences for doing this treasonous shit when you both get sued and indicted
  2. they also know that Truplestiltskin will not bail them out or come to your rescue when you do get caught (and you will get caught*)
  3. people likely to try this in the future aren't as brazen and bold as the Trumpettes at the top, so will be far less likely to risk this crap in the future, knowing the very real risk they're taking and they very real consequences they'll face when they get caught.
  4. last but not least: Justice, of course
[–] Wrench 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't hold my breath. The Wisconsin fake electors are the first to be sentenced, and it was nothing. They can't be electors when Trump is on the ballot. That's the extent of the punishment.

That's not going to discourage anyone. The opposite, really.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I hear ya, but I think I made a pretty good case for why it’s not “nothing”. If you wanna make an argument for why it’s not “enough“, then I’m right on board with you. 

[–] youngGoku 3 points 11 months ago
  1. Yes
  2. Yes
  3. Yes
  4. Hell yes
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In Wisconsin, 10 Republicans who posed as electors settled a civil lawsuit Wednesday, admitting their actions were part of an effort to overturn President Biden's victory.

In December 2020, six Republicans signed certificates falsely stating that Trump won Nevada and sent them to Congress and the National Archives, where they were ultimately ignored.

The House committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol looked into the role these fake electors in key battleground states took in Trump's attempt to cling to power after his 2020 defeat.

Trump and his attorneys also had a direct hand in the planning and execution of the fake elector scheme, including a conference call with McDonald, transcripts released last year show.

McDonald said in a brief phone interview that he had spent much of the day checking on people close to him who had been at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, when a person opened fire on campus hours earlier.

Fred Lokken, a longtime political science professor at Truckee Meadows Community College in Reno, said Wednesday the indictment isn't necessarily a surprise.


The original article contains 765 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] eran_morad 2 points 11 months ago