this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
381 points (98.2% liked)

Television

4622 readers
81 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SCB 166 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He changed his tune in a later arbitration case with Netflix, where he claimed that not only was the money contractually his to do with what he pleased, but Netflix owed him more than $14 million in unpaid invoices.

The absolute sack on this guy lmao

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's how you get blacklisted from Hollywood.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

With 55 million, do you even care lol

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel it depends how much of that money is still left useful.

[–] Noodle07 8 points 1 year ago

Wanna buy dogecoins?

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're reading this, Netflix, I'm willing to do the exact same thing for just $40 million.

[–] clearedtoland 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ll do it for just $500K and it’ll be a series about a man (me, extra savings on casting) wildly misspending the money battling a capitalist society run amok by paying off his mortgage and student loans. Episodes are about 30 secs to 1 min, depending how long the payment sites take to load.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

$500k will only barely get you a Rolls Royce Phantom, though 😞 Nobody should be expected to work under such horrible conditions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pelley 83 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this why they had to raise their prices again?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Netflix had in 2023 roughly 247 Million paying user (they say). Blowing 50 Mil. is like 0.20$ for every user. It was mostly a mix of inflation, greed and shareholder demand for profit increase (also greed) that made you pay now more, for barely the same service/product.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

*worse service

The crackdown on sharing accounts didn't personally affect me, but it was still one of the reasons I dropped it

[–] UltraMagnus0001 5 points 1 year ago

I got annoyed that the price kept going up and the quality of the shows went down, or there was just too much crap to filter out in order to watch something good. A lot of shows I like would randomly get cancelled, like Kim's Convenience, Altered Carbon and others I can't think of now.

[–] profdc9 73 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The good news is that there's going to be a riveting Netflix documentary about it,

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Going to honest, I'm more likely to watch that than what they were supposed to make.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Unless the doc's director also runs away with the money, a double bamboozle

[–] Touching_Grass 70 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When Netflix acquiesced and wired the money, Rinsch sent most of it directly to his personal Charles Schwab account, and made big bets on biotech firm Gilead Sciences, and on shorting the S&P 500 index. In just a few weeks he’d lost $5.9 million. Cutting his losses, Rinsch pulled $4 million from his Schwab account and put it directly into Dogecoin. Wow, such invest.

Hahaha they gave $millions to a guy from r/wallstreetbets

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He turned the $4m doge into like $17m didn't he?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Perfect. Haha

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

I don't know, but that would mean he was luckier, not less stupid.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The guy’s obviously mentally ill, but sounds like the only reason he ever got that much money was because of a bidding war.

Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in, and just copying each other to try and get what the other wants 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Must have been those big smart "decision makers" that figures this one out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Welcome to Netflix! You're greenlighted!

[–] Serinus 4 points 1 year ago

They're doing this with everything now. Corporate trends are deciding "Return to Office" a decade after jumping on the Work from Home bandwagon. They're all moving to "unlimited" PTO, because people use less on average than an allotted account, and they can monitor and punish anyone who uses more.

It's almost like the MBAs are trained to just follow each other.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Stupid companies not looking at what they’re investing in

I bet there's some assistant out there working under some Netflix production exec going I fucking knew it

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

I don’t think unproven director is the issue here

How does he move it all to a personal account?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago

Are we sure he didn't think he was hired to be the CEO?

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So this is where the money for my next season of Inside Job went? Fuck you Netflix 😩

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How the fuck can they just cut the series in the middle of a season? It was a great show.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

At this point if you are watching a Netflix show immediately after it starts airing, thats on you. What more do they need to do to prove they will drop any show the second it fails to meet their viewing requirements.

Basically cant even start watching a Netflix show until it's a season or two in.

[–] Jakdracula 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They will spend $500k to make a documentary about this, pump it up to hit #1, and at the end of the day net the same results: $55.5 million spent to have the #1 show.

[–] Jyrdano 14 points 1 year ago

Judging by the story in the article, the doc would be hundred times more interesting than the nonexistent tv show anyway.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those poor shareholders, my heart just breaks for them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It won't even touch them. It will come out of the pockets of lower level employees or future projects.

[–] YoBuckStopsHere 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Netflix really needs to vet their projects better.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

This just means they get to cancel a few of their good shows now. Their favorite thing to do.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

hey netflix give me Millions of dollars and ill make a tv show for you

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I mean, good for him lol

[–] paddirn 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey Netflix, I'm available too to make a sci-fi series. I'm an unproven director who can put something together for only like... $50 million. Totally worth your money.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll do it for $25 million. Hire me instead.

[–] SecretSauces 5 points 1 year ago

$25 million?! These guys are trying to rip you off. I can do it for $10 million. I'll even supply my own cast of (also unproven) actors!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can they not sue on a case like this?

[–] StarManta 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And get what money? The money’s spent, it’s gone, and the directors not getting another big payday like this ever again. They can spend $10k on lawyers to get the $216 in his checking account.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Article says it's in arbitration so it's not like they aren't doing anything about it. And one can assume they're still paying their lawyers quite a bit during the arbitration. Also the person can be forced to sell off assets to pay for damages.

Also at the end of the article it says he pulled out 27 million he made in doge coin from 4 million he invested of Netflix's money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They maybe can get him for wirefraud which means jail time. I don't know Im no lawyer though.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The article says it's in arbitration which is basically the same thing, sans an actual court.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe they have insurance over the project and can recover some of the money. The company I work for sell this kind of insurance, but is usually for construction projects.

[–] thorbot 4 points 1 year ago

Oh no!

Anyway...

[–] EvilTwin 2 points 1 year ago

Rolls-Royces, Crypto, And Dodgy Stock Bets

That's a funny way to spell cocaine and hookers.

load more comments
view more: next ›