this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
318 points (96.8% liked)

World News

39101 readers
5174 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Are... are they the Nazis now?

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's the crazy bully that hangs out with the group, has all the fun sadistic ideas, everybody goes oh don't listen to him He's crazy. But they're really listening to see how other people react to that crazy idea. The crazy outspoken guys testing the water, and if people don't argue too much....

It's like the racist making a joke not joke in a conversation to test you.... Schrödinger's douchebag... Except on a global political scale

[–] Nusm 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's known as a trial balloon. "Oh, I was only joking! Unless you're fine with it, then I'm serious."

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

ah, the "Shane Gillis" approach

[–] filister 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Point is that if this had happened anywhere outside Israel and the remark would be towards Israel, there would have been a huge outcry, and this guy would have been arrested, but now I am not even sure he will be removed from the government or returned silently after some time.

Justice for me but not for thee.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

but now I am not even sure he will be removed from the government

He has now been removed from the government.

[–] sirboozebum 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think he was only suspended.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It'd have been fine in most the Arab world, certainly Iran.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ireland is one of the few western countries that have criticised Israel's response to the Hamas attacks, so they're being punished now.

[–] Aceticon 11 points 1 year ago

They remember how it is to have your homeland occupied by a neighbouring nation that thinks you are an inferior people.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@jonne collective punishment is so evil.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But on brand for Israel. I guess when they say 'never again', they're not talking about genocide in general.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never again to us is what you should interpret it as. A group taking steps to ensure that their near genocide can never be repeated doesn't burden them with a moral crusade to end all genocide.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@Apollo good point.

Regardless of our histories I would hope we all have, if not a crusade, at least a strong moral desire to end genocide.

Not committing it is a good start.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] filister 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They got criticized by Michael D. Higgins. This guy is unreal. He is so charismatic and positive and though I don't know him personally he looks like an amazing human being.

[–] Squizzy 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Siegfried 4 points 1 year ago

Good thing far right isn't in power... wait

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

i read this at first "far-right monster" and this also works

[–] TheJims 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And nuke the hostages you pretend to care so much about?

[–] Agent641 8 points 1 year ago

And irradiate Israel's own foodbowl.

[–] WolfhoundRO 5 points 1 year ago

Benny: "Hostages?"

[–] Aceticon 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"What are a few lifes lost when it's for the greater good?!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

...am I misunderstanding the distance between israel and gaza or am I misunderstanding how nukes work? This sounds like a really bad plan unless I'm wrong about something.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Tactical nukes exist, there would be fallout, but depending on the nuke itself, and the burst configuration, that could be limited, and with favorable winds go out over the sea.

Not to mention neutron bombs which are "cleaner" and just kill organics.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron_bomb

But none of this really makes sense, given the fact that gaza's completely surrounded, and total air and military superiority exists there's cleaner ways to kill everyone.

One could argue this politician is trying to anchor a really bad idea, so the people agree with a terrible idea that's not as bad later.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(western) neutron bombs were made for single and very specific explicit purpose: to kill crews of soviet tanks quickly while not generating too much fallout over friendly territory (west germany). neutron bombs are still nukes and still have powerful blast and so on; but while everyone outside of tank is fried anyway no matter what nuke you use, neutrons specifically ignore heavy metal shielding. neutrons are however also stopped by things like air, concrete, and especially water, fuel, plastics and such; most importantly, when first DPICM and then antitank PGMs deployable from considerable distance (think CBU-97 or BONUS, not ATGMs) became a thing, these things just stopped being necessary and were withdrawn from service

against a city you don't want a neutron bomb. other than tanks, it's a thing to be used against other nukes, but nuclear anti-ballistic defenses seem a little crazy today so it was phased out too. if you look at actual doomsday arsenals of actual nuclear states, the things stockpiled are plain ol big dirty thermonuclear devices, dial-a-yield from below 1kt to somewhere around 500kt with guidance kit added. even against other nukes neutron bombs aren't expected to be used today, turns out just bending them out of shape while still in silo seems to be easier

does israel have neutron bombs? probably, would it be effective against a city? not more than regular nukes, and at any rate, just like you say, tons and tons of PGMs are just simpler, easier to deal with and much safer diplomatically

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

See, that's what I was thinking but you're a whole lot more technical than "yeah I'm pretty sure that is dumb" like I said lol.

[–] pacific 9 points 1 year ago

Not an expert by any means, but nukes can get smaller than one would think. The fallout would be the most dangerous thing for Israel, in both the physical and political sense.

[–] dojan 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow, imagine having voted for this bucket head.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's an insult to buckethead. He's a great musician.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] febra 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And this is what western leaders throw their "unconditional support" at..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] steventhedev 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] evulhotdog 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like it’s a temporary formality to avoid backlash. I’m sure this is one of Bibi’s top staff.

He’s there to test the waters.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's gotta be the most pro-genocide comment section I've ever seen. I know it's an Israeli publication, but goddamn there's some disturbing shit there

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's better than r/worldnews. But that's a very, very low bar.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FunkyButter 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He has been censured by the Israeli government and stripped him of his ability to be in briefing meetings. Many in the Knesset are also now working to have him removed. The prime minister immediately released a statement that this was completely inappropriate and contrary to the way in which the IDF operates in accordance with the rules of armed conflicts.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don’t like people saying the quiet part loud.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sirboozebum 5 points 1 year ago

The Isreali Minisitry of Intelligence had literally drafted up an options plan to ethnically cleanse Gaza and deport everyone.

Let's not congratulate Isreal on drawing the line at nukes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is Gaza not considered desert? Should they move to the Negev?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Stop talking if you don't know shit.

load more comments
view more: next ›