this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
365 points (96.7% liked)

World News

32379 readers
1026 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] teflocarbon 63 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As they mention in the article they anticipated a much slower collapse and likely prepared for that. But at the rate it’s currently going, it’s quite astounding. The fragmentation and internal strife in Russia are certainly not over.

I did read one article that made a reference to this more being an “end of the beginning” rather than the “beginning of the end”. Which I agree with. It hasn’t collapsed the federation overnight, but it’s certainly weakened it a hell of a lot.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Living in Russia, I have mixed feelings about this slow controlled collapse TBF.

For Russia itself, maybe things being over after a couple of months (or years) of civil war starting in 1999 would be better.

But for everybody else, of course, there are bigger risks associated with that. Not really something nuclear even, just economically less pleasant.

[–] dustedhands 6 points 1 year ago

Are you in Russia right now? How are things over there?

[–] robolemmy 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I really hate reportage like this. Every government, even seemingly incompetent ones like the current crop in the UK, have hundreds or thousands of contingency plans for things of wildly varying likelihood. This is just one of those things.

This is just as informative as those articles that say eating sugar triggers the same receptors as cocaine. Yes it's true, but there aren't that many reward mechanisms in the brain, so a lot of shit hits those same receptors.

It's data and it's true, but it's not useful information.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We have a plan to invade literally every country and for if that country invades us that is updated regularly. I always found that kind of funny but it isn't shocking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Why would it be funny?

Having a plan for an unlikely event is not funny if having such a plan is your job. There are plenty of people who should do exactly that.

Because not having a plan for an unlikely event that bloody happens is, eh, negatively funny.

[–] dustedhands 4 points 1 year ago

It's like saying the police is preparing for thieves robbing the bank or the fire department preparing for a wildfire. It's part of their job and it would be stranger not to have a contingency plan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarraignTheSane 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If you're preparing for it, is it really that "unexpected"...?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

You can be prepared for all kinds of things you aren't expecting. For example you could get occupational disablement insurance while not expecting to ever use it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Maybe they're preparing for it so it won't be unexpected

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

The anticipatory poop challenge part deux.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In their place i would rather prepare for scenario of unexpected collapse of United Kingdom.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Who says they have not prepared for that?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Considering their preparations for other things, like brexit or covid i would say LOL.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

UK politicians never really seem prepared for anything tbh

[–] cashews_win 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was made into a film called Children of Men.

[–] MelonTheMan 2 points 1 year ago

Great movie and accurately depicts brexit

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Plan for a possible possible eventuality? That'll be a first.

I assume there was a plan that Cameron got rid of because reasons and now they can't find the PDF so they'll have to do it again.

[–] c0mbatbag3l 3 points 1 year ago

Someone couldn't rotate it so they just deleted it and pretended it never came.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Am I missing something or did nothing in the article match the title?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I thought it was; maybe the link you got was to the front page, or something? The article was mostly about how Prigozhin's attempted coup (or whatever it was) surprised Western leaders, and a bunch of speculation about how the West is scrambling to prepare contingemcy plans. So the one I read seemed to match.

However, I think it was a fluff article, with little substance. Prigozhin has been agitating for weeks, and I seriously doubt MI6 (or the CIA) was surprised by his actions. Or that nobody has a contingency plan for chaos in Russia. Putin's a dictator, and when dictators die, it's rarely a peaceful transition of power.

[–] SocializedHermit 9 points 1 year ago

"Some people in UK government maybe consider thinking about doing something because something happened". Much better title.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

It's Pravda, literally the propaganda arm of the Ukrainian Government.

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Like they prepared for the unexpected Spanish Inquisition?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Honestly I doubt that Putin will fall from power that easily. He seems to take nots of precautions and he has lots of friends

[–] Oderus 6 points 1 year ago

If history repeats itself, which it often does, Putin is in big trouble. Last collapse happened after 15,000 troops died in the Afghan war. Now they've lost easily 4x that number in 1/5th the time.

[–] Fondots 2 points 1 year ago

Even if there's no coup/revolution/he doesn't get assassinated/etc.

He's 70, and very possibly not in the best health. Statistically it wouldn't be very surprising if he dropped dead of natural causes at any moment. Technically he's already a small anomaly of a Russian male just because he has lived as long as he has since their average life expectancy is currently something like 65 (which is admittedly skewed very young by a whole lot of stuff like drinking, drug use, suicide, and being shipped off to Ukraine) And even if he beats all odds and lives another 30 years it still shouldn't be unexpected for him to just decide to step down and retire at some point. Shit, if I had a fraction of the money and assets he has, I'd have called it quits a long time ago and disappeared from the public view.

And when he goes, no matter how he goes, there's going to be a power vacuum that needs to be filled and a whole lot of assholes jockeying for position. I won't pretend to know how that will go, maybe there will be all-out civil war, maybe just a handful of the right people will fall out of windows or drink polonium tea or just get disappeared, maybe there will be a major economic collapse and a rise in crime rates, maybe everything will just be hunky-dory and it really was just Putin holding everything back and Russia will enter a new age of enlightenment (it will probably not be that last one)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Pravda really fell off

[–] _finger_ 3 points 1 year ago

Aw shit here we go again

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I sincerely do not understand why...

Maybe it's your attitude and insulting manner? None of your arguments required your comments about "liberals". Given those, it's disingenuous to attribute the downvotes to your "facts".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know mexico is really worried....so they drink tequila and move on.

[–] graphite 1 points 1 year ago

so they drink tequila and move on

based

[–] boredtortoise 1 points 1 year ago

Unexpected? I thought everyone was already expecting

load more comments
view more: next ›