this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
74 points (78.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35944 readers
1984 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ma11en 74 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Most land based plants would die if fed saltwater.

The water would in most cases sink away below the surface too.

[–] foggy 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While that's true, a large saltwater deposit somewhere arid would allow for water to evaporate into the air and create humidity and increase the probability of rain occurring in that area regularly.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

If by "large Saltwater deposit" you mean "an ocean" then maybe. Pumped sea water? No.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LordOfTheChia 68 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First off, the water would need to be desalinated or you would ensure the land would be unsuitable for farming (and really growing anything) for generations.

Also, sand doesn't hold water. In fact, when planting trees and other bushes, if you want more drainage, you typically add rocks and sand.

Second, most plants need non-sandy soil to grow on (palm trees and other beach bushes and plants aside) though those grow in areas that have lots of rain already.

Thirdly, the soil will need bacteria to aid the plants in obtaining nutrients and breaking down waste (dead leaves, dead plantlife, etc).

The way to do it is to look at a couple of projects that are fighting against desertification in Africa:

  1. The Great Green Wall https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/great-green-wall/

  2. Using compostable waste to fertilize soil https://jstories.media/article/greening-the-desert-with-trash

You'll notice that many of these projects start at the edges of deserts. Instead of relying on pumping water onto sandy soil (which would just suck up the water as sand doesn't hold water that well) they focus on extending the non desert ecosystem onto the desert so that the new soil will absorb water better, the weather over the newly terraformed area will be less dry, and it will eventually be self sustaining.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago

Saltwater doesn't revive soil, it kills it.

[–] pwnicholson 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's been done before (though not intentionally at first), at the Salton Sea.

And the results weren't that bad (granted possibly a smaller scale than some are imagining when they forecast doom).

https://www.ppic.org/blog/the-troubled-history-and-uncertain-future-of-the-salton-sea/

But the problem is any deserts are deserts for a reason: lack of rainfall and/or natural inflow from rainwater upstream. The result is that you have to keep pumping in tons of water and/or rely on agricultural runoff which is nutrient-depleted and usually full of chemicals.

Read the rest of the linked article for what's going on with that one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It is also important to note that most of the water that made the Salton Sea came from the Colorado River being rerouted back into California, then from irrigation water seepage.

Even then, the Salton Sea has a hard time supporting marine life. I can't imagine making it a salt water lake would really help the local wildlife.

[–] dumbcrumb 30 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Deserts are actually very important to the worlds ecosystem. The Amazon rainforest probably wouldnt exist without the Sahara. A lot of the Sahara's sand is made up of dead plankton and these dead plankton are blown across the seas by strong winds and eventually land in the amazon. These plankton give the soil extra nutrients and are one of the main reasons why the south Americans are so lush with life.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

Your first sentence is true, the rest is disputed https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-020-00071-w

[–] HonoraryMancunian 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They also landed in England the other week, all the cars were filthy lol

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Poor cars enjoying extra nutrients from dead plankton in peace while this guy comes and call them filthy!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, we shouldn't kink shame.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The sheer volume of water that moves through even a small creek is shockingly massive.

The amount of water held in an aquifer is astounding.

The soils required for agriculture and general growing plants (ones that hold water and nutriet) specifically are lacking or depleted in deserts.

So... it's a literal pipe dream.

[–] dipshit 3 points 1 year ago

Aquifers! Aquifers all over the land!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're wrong about the soil nutrient content in deserts. Or at least it's not a blanket statement like that since some deserts are essential in providing soil nutrients to other parts of the world through wind.

[–] ForgotAboutDre 6 points 1 year ago

Deserts can have lots of minerals and the sand/dust is carried on the wind. Theses are important but the desert won't be high in nitrogen and carbon.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh the nutrients are there, the composition of the soil is what is lacking so those nutrients don't infiltrate into water well so plants can't access them. It's mostly sand and clay, lacking in silts for proper loams and organic matter.

Also there's usually a ton of salt in desert sand that doesn't help.

[–] Saraphim 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Have you ever heard the phrase “salt the earth”? That’s the fastest way to kill everything in the soil and make sure nothing grows for a very very long time.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Carthago delenda est

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnalogyAddict 18 points 1 year ago

Most deserts have life, which you would kill. But for sandy deserts, have you never built a sand castle?

The reasons are legion, starting with the fact that it wouldn't work.

[–] Treczoks 14 points 1 year ago

Because that's how you make salt lakes. Instead of reviving them, it would kill off the last remaining traces of life.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In addition to what everyone else already said, it takes a tremendous amount of energy to pump water uphill.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck 12 points 1 year ago

Salt.

If the area’s enviroment didn’t have it to start with adding it will kill off whatever lives there.

Also? Generally there’s a reason it’s a desert (lack of rainfall,) and is itself (usually) a vibrant ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were you planning on desalinating the seawater first? Because that requires an immense amount of energy to do, and we haven’t even touched on the topic of the energy required to move water from one place to another.

If you weren’t planning on desalinating the seawater, then the salt will definitely destroy whatever nutrients the desert sand might have had, rendering seawater irrigation completely pointless.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember somebody pointing out that one of the interesting projects that would become available with the development of Fusion energy would be large scale terraforming of deserts. The technology we essentially already have, the problem is that the current technology is incredibly energy inefficient, but if we don't care about energy efficiency, because we essentially have more than we will ever know what to do with, we can just go ham.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

more than we will ever know what to do with

That'll last maybe five minutes

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just think of how many monkey jpgs we could make with that kind of energy!

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Saltwater destroys soil and vegetation instead of facilitating its existence. And you’d need to add better soil and the means to produce more fertile soil (plant species that shed leaves often and have nitrogen-fixing microbes in their roots).

But such water would make rain in the surrounding area more likely and common, if it can be sustained. For instance, I hear there are plans to re-create an inlet in northern Libya that used to exist but dried up when it was cut off from the Mediterranean by an earthquake that pushed up a natural dam some 6000 years ago or something, so the surroundings can become greener. (But given the current flooding of roughly that same area, doing so would be a terrible idea for the people who now live in that below-sea-level area.)

[–] Nastybutler 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SickPanda 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It got what plants crave, electrolytes

[–] Nastybutler 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What even are electrolytes? Does anyone know!?

[–] SickPanda 2 points 1 year ago

It's what plants crave duh

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

A lot of deserts get a fresh water pulse occasionally, and things spring back to life. If you take that away it destroys more ecology. You're better off making multilevel greenspace in the cities.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If the ice caps keep melting, we're going to see what happens! In real time

[–] TheBananaKing 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just saying we coincidentally also have a problem with billions of plastic water bottles littering up the place.

Now, call me a fool, but...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

History teaches us that when we mess with the ecosystem, something dies/extinct

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Project plowshare 2.0

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Aside from the issues stated already. This would need to be a truly monstrous amount of water. The cost would simply be far too much to justify any sort of benefit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I was thinking that a solution to rising sea levels could be a canal from the Atlantic to that part of the Sahara that’s below sea level.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You may be underestimating how much water is in the ocean

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The mariana trench is also below sea level lol

[–] angrystego 1 points 1 year ago

Because that would turn the delicious deserts into disgusting salty porridge. I'm terribly sorry.

load more comments
view more: next ›