this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
793 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26971 readers
5662 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] saucyloggins 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That’s because the government has had tech way beyond even what we have today. They just peace-meal it out to us bro. They’ve been coordinating mass propaganda against us 1984 style since like. Before 1984.

Also. The government is so incompetent they can’t provide health care better than private insurance companies. Obviously.

[–] Alvinum 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They won't provide or create the framework for proper health care in the US because private health care is a very effective extortion scheme that can pay for the laws they want.

And the pharma companies like it like that.

"Oh, you like living? Too bad you live in the US, where we will charge you 10x what everyone else in the world pays for the insulin you need to survive. Pay up or die.

https://fortune.com/2023/01/13/insulin-us-costs-7-times-canada-california-suing-makers-scheming-illegally-increase-price/amp/

There is a reason the US has the most expensive health care system in the world, while the health care system quality using objective criteria,l is usually around rank 40-60, below practically all western countries, below cuba and comparable to Armenia or Morocco.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1290168/health-index-of-countries-worldwide-by-health-index-score/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Health_Organization_ranking_of_health_systems_in_2000

The US is also basically the only industrialized country where medical bankruptcy is a thing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

You're not wrong, but I think the above poster was sarcastically pointing out that people who believe that the government is highly coordinated and competent don't trust the government to run healthcare because it's too uncoordinated and incompetent. Both incredibly strong and also laughably weak.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sounds reasonable... you've got my vote

[–] kamen 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"The moon landing was staged, but Stanley Kubrick demanded to shoot on location."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Gee , think about all the logistics that goes into this obvious stage ~on the location~

[–] kurikai 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't get to talk about Beast Wars enough these days.

[–] popekingjoe 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Beast Wars used to be great.

It still is, but it used to be too.

[–] quicksand 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Fleshtrap 29 points 1 year ago

Beast Wars was so dope.

[–] spacesweedkid27 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it was staged or something but if I look at 2001: A Space Odyssey, I really am fascinated by the good visual effects, so the raw filming could probably have been done, but most Nasa documents of that time are online and there is no possiblity everything would have been fake.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, the technology to fake the moon landing straight up didn't exist in the 60s. There's a really good video on youtube that goes over it but I can't seem to find it right now. But basically, even though there were some nice techniques to make special effects for movies, they wouldn't have worked for faking an actual moon landing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For some reason, to me at least, there is a good amount of irony in this. Almost like because the technology and techniques to replicate a convincing moon landing weren't around they just went there instead lol

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's why I love that fact too. Sending a rocket into space and landing on a tiny ball of rock was literally easier than pretending to do it.

[–] Chadsalot 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well yeah but that's just the CGI that's available to the public. Everyone knows the governments been using holograms since the 60s. Wake up.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why holograms in the '60s? Didn't you hear about the experimental hallucinogen laced AC units?

[–] Misconduct 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No but are they still accepting applications for that one or...?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Nah, you just gotta ask the folks in the know, "'Token' AC?" and they'll hook you up /s

[–] ZAX2717 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean the CGI was awesome at the time, I was also 7 so take that with a grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was around the same age. It was high tech!

[–] Enasni 9 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/science/apollo-landing-footage-would-have-been-impossible-to-fake-a-film-expert-explains-why

Unironically, this is actually my favorite take on the moon landing conspiracy. The technology to fake the footage and photos we got simply didn't exist at the time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

My take is that they hired Kubrick to make the footage but he insisted on shooting it on-location.

[–] Cosmonaut_Collin 6 points 1 year ago

I know it may not seem like it, but this gorilla is computer generated.

[–] PunnyName 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You one of those crazy people who believes in the moon‽

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Wow a wild interrobang appeared!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do not get it. Why 1996? What’s relationship of that date with the moon landings?

[–] anewbeginning 6 points 1 year ago

If in 1996 cgi was shit in the 60s it would never be better than this. In reality it didn’t even exist.

[–] Pregnenolone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, Apollo 13 the movie literally came out the year prior so we had the ability to depict the moon landing with CGI in the 90s.

[–] fidodo 6 points 1 year ago

Most of that movie was done with practical effects and miniatures. The CGI was relatively minimal since it was so weak back then.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wow that intro brings back memories.

Kind of surprised it only went 3 seasons/55 episodes, seemed popular at the time.

https://yewtu.be/playlist?list=PL_hfDtD68l8X7JjIAf1pusxoaX2JN1iAg

[–] z500 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There were also two seasons of Beast Machines, but it wasn't quite the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, that's just prime...

[–] avater 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but the 3D effects in Jurassic Park were made by two passionate developers who basically invented rigging to make those sequences and went totally over budget and did it without the lighting tech we have today. Which is to say, they hand crafted each UV. That technique would never be used today but the results speak for themselves

[–] avater 3 points 1 year ago

but maybe Neil Armstrong was also very dedicated?