this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
347 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President-elect Donald Trump’s team warned Republican lawmakers to support his controversial Cabinet picks or risk facing primary challenges funded by Elon Musk.

Amid scrutiny over nominees like Matt Gaetz for attorney general and Pete Hegseth for defense secretary, Trump insisted the president determines the Cabinet.

Resistance has grown among Senate Republicans, including Sen. Thom Tillis, opposing “recess appointments” to bypass confirmation.

Senators like Josh Hawley and Mitch McConnell emphasized the need for proper constitutional vetting of nominees despite Trump’s pressure tactics.

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

But don't worry, Trump has no involvement with Project 2025. He's just doing every single thing it spells out

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

On one hand: get money out of politics, end citizens united, etc

On the other hand: lol. lmao, even

[–] Shotgun_Alice 12 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is that a threat, blackmail, or both?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago

It's how politics is done now. AIPAC and the NRA have been doing this for decades.

[–] Sam_Bass 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 6 days ago

That is scary to them. Because they know that will be the end of their career.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Harris outspent Trump by a significant amount and still lost. Take that as you will.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 6 days ago

Harris vs. Trump wasn't a primary. It also had to appeal to a much larger group of people with much wider views.

[–] brucethemoose 152 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Wow.

He's basically threatening to "buy" them out of office with his billionare friend's money if they even question his picks.

What's the word I'm looking for... Nepotism? That doesn't seem to cover it.

[–] Sam_Bass 4 points 6 days ago

If you need an -ism' try cronyism

[–] disguy_ovahea 133 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Corrupt. The word is corrupt.

[–] CitizenKong 63 points 1 week ago

Also fascist.

[–] brucethemoose 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Random aside, but I did not get a notification for your reply.

...Why? This happens a lot to me, and I thought it was a quirk with users on other Lemmy domains, but we're both on .world.

[–] disguy_ovahea 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, that happens to me too. I haven’t noticed a pattern or indicator as to why though.

[–] brucethemoose 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the first time I've caught it without clearing my notifications. Is there any way to ping the devs about this? Maybe I'll look for an issue on Lemmy's git...

And I just realized how awesome it is that I can do that vs. Reddit or any other social media where tickets are a black hole.

[–] disguy_ovahea 2 points 1 week ago

Way better, for sure. Let me know if you get an answer.

[–] brucethemoose 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As an addendum, I got a notification from this above message, so it's not like we're bugged/blocked specifically from each others.

[–] disguy_ovahea 1 points 1 week ago
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 51 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hmm, one guy... at the top... threatens other government officials if he doesn't get exactly what he wants...

Coming up empty. 😐

[–] brucethemoose 10 points 1 week ago
[–] GladiusB 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All I can think of is my cheap groceries

[–] SPRUNT 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And how you won't see cheap groceries again?

[–] GladiusB 9 points 1 week ago

That was sarcasm

[–] snekerpimp 11 points 1 week ago
[–] MrJameGumb 81 points 1 week ago

Trump's GOP: "we're the party of FREEDOM! Now pretend you like the hoard of unqualified psychopaths Trump has chosen, otherwise we're just going to pay to get them in power anyway!

COMPLY! OBEY! DO AS YOU'RE TOLD OR FACE DIRE CONSEQUENCES!

You're going to have so much freedom now"

[–] dhork 63 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

I view this as mildly positive. It means that more picks are in trouble, and the Senate is not just gonna roll over and recess them into their jobs without hearings. Senators who got elected this time, in particular, have 6-year terms that will outlast Trump's term. Who knows what state MAGA and Musk will be in by then?

(There will be plenty of horrible picks that get through, of course, but the worst of the worst might get blocked by Republicans, just like Gaetz.)

This also really does show the power dynamic here. Musk is Trump's sugar daddy. Trump's entire career was built on spending Daddy's money, why should his political career be any different? Musk owns Trump now, and I think this proves that.

[–] Catma 39 points 1 week ago

I do not believe for 1 second any of the talk from either Hawley or Tillis is truthful. They say they oppose the recess appointments but they will end up rubber stamping anyoneTrump puts forward. I really think Gaetz would have gotten through. Oh sure Mukorwski or Collins would be "very concerned" about it but would vote accordingly.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Who knows what state MAGA and Musk will be in by then?

For Musk, I personally hope he's in the 6 foot under state pretty damn soon.

I was sick of that piece of shit before, but lately he's been going full douche overdrive. He's buying the entire government... If this isn't the best damn case against having billionaires as a possibility I don't know what is.

[–] SulaymanF 3 points 6 days ago

Just waiting for him to overdose on the ketamine he’s so fond of.

[–] MataVatnik 4 points 1 week ago

This is when I wish conspiracy theories of a deep state shadow government that takes out rogue actors were real

[–] Upsidedownturtle 9 points 1 week ago

Seems like there isn't any reason to play along with his horrible appointments unless you're 100% on board already drinking the kool-aid. If you're up in 2 years then bad picks will exacerbate the problems trump causes making '26 a referendum on trump which would be bad for any republicans. If you're up in 2 or 4 years you'll outlast trump and his ire won't mean too much.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Lol so that was musk reason for calling Putin, he bought trumps debt.

[–] cultsuperstar 2 points 1 week ago

They'll roll over. They always do. Any resistance is just for show. They don't want to look completely spineless. Just mostly spineless.

[–] xenomor 42 points 1 week ago

I’m old enough to remember when the Republican base was pretending to be alarmed by “rich men north of Richmond” pulling strings and undermining the will of the people. Oh, and remember “the swamp”? That was a good one.

[–] HootinNHollerin 31 points 1 week ago

Time to deport the illegal immigrant musk

[–] HootinNHollerin 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Since the Supreme Court gave Biden immunity and he’s fucking 80 he should do something drastic To show he even cares about us

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife 8 points 6 days ago

They didn't give Biden immunity - they gave themselves the right to determine what actions a President can or cannot do with immunity.

[–] distantsounds 5 points 6 days ago

Unless it involves giving Israel more bombs, Biden doesn’t give a fuck

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 6 days ago

If he cared about us, he wouldn't have run for re-election in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

He doesn't. He cares more about Bibi

[–] MataVatnik 9 points 1 week ago

Wishful thinking, catch myself doing it too sometimes.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago

I’m surprised that Josh Hawley is standing up to Trump given that he is an absolute coward. I live right near this toad.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Senators look in the mirror and see a future president. They might not have spines, but the size of their ego let's them stand.