this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2024
24 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

715 readers
196 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NegativeLookBehind 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blue_Morpho 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To be fair, the 1.6 nm is a label that has absolutely nothing to do with the feature size.

As the article says, 1.6 is the same as the last process but with backside power delivery.

It's weird that Intel got grief for 14, then 14+, then 14+++ but TMSC does the same thing, lies in their marketing by calling it 1.6, and everyone is happy.

[–] NegativeLookBehind 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yea, it’s marketing jargon for sure. My comment still stands, because this technology is amazing.

[–] Blue_Morpho 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah it's amazing. But it is how funny no one called Intel 14++ amazing despite doing the same as TMSC is doing now, plus not lying.