this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
534 points (98.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26901 readers
5076 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 day ago (3 children)

>New logo is soulless slop

Every single company

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Makes it easier to forget them and not being able to keep them apart. That's really great for us. Less ads in our brains.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AWittyUsername 10 points 1 day ago

Soon there will be no color, no originality.

Just a single font to use everything will be homogeneous and consolidated. Minimal, inoffensive and focused grouped to appeal to everyone and also no one.

Movies, music, games, brands.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

A design consultant probably sent Jaguar a six-figure bill for this new logo, you know.

[–] AeonFelis 16 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

The font is ugly.

[–] FauxPseudo 55 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I would have failed every design class I took in college if I submitted that. Why such wide kerning? Why lower case but upper G? Why so round? Why so completely unreadable at a distance because of micro serifs? There isn't one good design element in this.

[–] nepenthes 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

It doesn't say "car" at all either; no elegance or prestige. The old logo was sexy. New one looks like a logo for bottled water or something.

Edit: it's like going from James Bond to Austin Powers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Asidonhopo 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think they want people to focus on the "agua" and the j and r are just little accents on it like its word art rather than a logo. Like, I literally picture the marketing weirdos at the meeting going off like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

/uj Technically this is their new logo:

J a G U a r is just their new typeface (I think that’s the name?); and apparently/allegedly is to make the pronunciation closer to UK English, rather than American.

Either way, though - it’s still..

/j

..pReTtY fArKiN’ sToOoPiD.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I would have guessed that was a Puma logo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

typeface (I think that’s the name?);

Logotype.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wow, they really took their logo from sexy, fast and expensive looking, to looking like an over priced soft drink?

That's impressive, haha.

[–] AnUnusualRelic 9 points 1 day ago

It looks like an off brand sportswear shirt you'd find on an African market.

[–] [email protected] 73 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I fucking hate this minimalist design trend more than it is probably reasonable to hate an aesthetic. It's got the personality of unfinished drywall.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly I think unfinished drywall has more personality. It’s utilitarian and rough around the edges, without the shiny surface veneer.

That new Jaguar logo is like somebody took a beautiful old house full of exposed brick and wood work and put a coating of white paint over everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FangedWyvern42 17 points 1 day ago

They went from luxury car company to mediocre smartphone brand

[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 days ago (16 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Better:

  • Revolut (though a fintech company named after a revolution lacking the charge at the end is still moronic in several ways)
  • airbnb (from awful to meh)
  • Spotify (same)

Worse:

  • Pinterest (original fit the platform and what it is/was pretty much perfectly. Current is meh)
  • eBay (both are bad IMO, but at least the original was bad in a playful and eye-catching way. The new one is just more meh
  • Burberry (the stag was notable and signalled a history of old-fashioned quality that's suitably rugged. The new one is meh AND insecure about people knowing which London they're from)
  • Rimova (yet another fashion brand apparently afraid of being noticed
  • DF (from one of the best and most fashion-appropriate logos to an absolute eyesore and kerning nightmare that invites vandalism)
  • Jaguar (From absolutely iconic and great in every way to even uglier than the new DF one. I hope whomever came up with that got both fired and beaten and I'm a pacifist.)

The rest just go from meh to slightly different meh 🤷

[–] naught101 24 points 2 days ago

I liked the old aibnb one.

Microsoft went from "boring with a bit of attitude" to just plain boring

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] electric 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Those old fashion logos are actually sick. Concerning that an industry that sells style would make these their logos.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

GUys I'm from ~~2040~~ 2035, here's Microsoft's logo

MS corporate comms army did a sik job getting across those inscrutable monolith vibes, I bet when it launched they all clapped (even though clapping is in performance reviews)

BONUS: heres Amazon, Faceberg and Nvideo too (yay diversity)

spoiler

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] patak 4 points 1 day ago

oversimplifying logoes and stuff makes me rage, especially this

[–] [email protected] 113 points 2 days ago

"We're a tech company now!" logo

[–] dgmib 7 points 1 day ago

That looks like marketing, let their six-year-old design the logo. Half the letters or lowercase and half are uppercase.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Awh hell nah, no more JAAAAAAAAAAG :(

[–] HerrVorragend 71 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Top looks like it belongs on a nice sports car.

Bottom looks like you can find it on a new Multipla.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (4 children)

That font is awful. The G looks completely unrelated to any of the other letters.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EtAl_isGitch 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Their logo doesn't have a jaguar and their car commercial doesn't have any cars. Fuck it, whatever

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I hate these new logos these corporations make, the old jaguar logo looked like power the new one looks like some weird startup.

[–] deltreed 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

They probably paid 10 million for that and a 12 year old could have made it.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Somewhere in Jaguar HQ, a marketing firm convinced the CxO suite that the most pressing problem facing the company was that the logo was wrong. So, in the interests of the shareholders they write off the goodwill value of the existing brand and dump millions of euro into this.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] inbeesee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're trying to impress investors with 'serious' design, not stand out with a unique one

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nothing says "serious" like mixing upper and lower case letters yet keeping them all the same height, so it looks like a third grader wrote it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sam_Bass 2 points 1 day ago

Just buy an old style one and replace the new one with it if you just have to have a jag

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Skoda have done something similar with their latest offering. No Skoda badge, no radiator grill. Just SKODA in a boring font.

load more comments
view more: next ›