this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
650 points (98.9% liked)

News

23371 readers
3063 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid 94 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Congratulations to all of you!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm loving how there are people responding to this that I've blocked (their comments won't load). I can only imagine what they're complaining about.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In this case, the response you had blocked is worth seeing just because it was weird as fuck:

Not sure, who you are congratulating and what does love have to do with army related things?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hate to double reply... But it's crazy how many mental people are on Lemmy. It blows my mind sometimes.

[–] Lennny 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Try a chan, this is sanity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I already ate. Thank you though

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh man. That's sad. It doesn't even make any sense.

"What does congratulating service members have to do with the army things?".

Uhhh

[–] Lennny 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Idk personally, it's a little gay.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I honorably laughed. Oh you

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 month ago (2 children)

“Since DADT repeal [in 2010], many veterans who sought to upgrade their less than honorable discharges reported a prolonged and burdensome process, often requiring the use of a lawyer, to seek the respect and benefits they rightfully earned,” the letter stated. “And far too many veterans discharged under DADT had no idea they could seek an upgrade or where to start the process.”

Austin said today that 96% of the service members who were separated under DADT now have an honorable discharge.

“We will continue to strive to do right by every American patriot who has honorably served their country,” he said.

Glad the Biden Admin proactively upgraded their discharge statuses so no more veterans have to fight to change theirs

[–] InverseParallax 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Glad the Biden Admin proactively upgraded their discharge statuses so no more veterans have to fight to change theirs

Nooo! Shut up! We have to focus on the horrible genocide in Gaza, while steering hard away from the horrible genocide in Ukraine!!!

--all of .ml

[–] FlyingSquid 14 points 1 month ago

They also don't want you to talk about the genocide those now honorably discharged veterans are facing in event of a Trump victory.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Are you saying this outweighs supporting a genocide?

Like oh he might have killed someone but he did pay his parking tickets. There is no comparison here.

Hell he's not even running, why even downplay his crimes.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge 55 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This should've been done sooner.

[–] Orbituary 67 points 1 month ago (1 children)

All justice should be swifter. I'm still glad some people got acknowledged.

[–] almar_quigley 15 points 1 month ago
[–] halfwaythere 51 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Can you shoot? Can you move? Can you communicate?

Then who the fuck cares who you prefer to be involved with!? Especially when a lot of soldiers/officers seem to like to be with other people's wives/husbands!

[–] FlyingSquid 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is the same reason why women should be allowed the same combat positions as men. They still aren't and it's stupid.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

If I remember correctly, the US started rolling back restrictions in 2013. Progress has definitely been slow, and we aren't where we should be yet, but things are moving in the right direction.

[–] kofe 10 points 1 month ago

We still have a ways to go with psychologist research, to be fair. My dad served two tours between 2003-2006 and only more recently came to understand PTSD isn't something you just "get over."

Same for sexism. It's not easy for service members to get over that engrained idea of protecting women at the cost of the team. There's a lot of promising research in resilience studies preparing military members prior to entering combat that I think could apply. As long as researchers and artists involved in VR type training are careful to include particular elements like more femme voices and such, it can be overcome before it's an issue in active combat

And to be clear, I'm not familiar with the research veterans have cited to me that it is an issue to begin with. I've only really looked at PTSD and the use of VR for exposure therapy and CBT. I'm inclined to believe it would be an issue for at least some men. I'd like to look at Israel as a case study example when I get some time since they've had compulsory service for men and women for a while now

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is it because things are moving slow, or because there just isn't as many women as men signing up?

I imagine there's a natural imbalance between who wants to sign up. I'm just spitballing though, happy to be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

There are definitely fewer women In the military in general. And many fewer women pursuing certain positions, like Rangers or SEALs.

The institutions moved slowly, too. Some groups within the military were hesitant to open up fully to women. And there are the usual systemic hurdles, like physical fitness tests that favored male physiques, which put women at a disadvantage until they were changed.

I think women's participation in the military will mirror what we have seen in women's athletics: as it becomes more common we will see closer parity between women and men. I also suspect the services will find that women tend to perform certain skills better than men.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 month ago

Progress would be abolishing the military not dooming more people to be killed for imperialism

[–] BeardedBlaze 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Name one combat position women aren't allowed in (US).

[–] AngryCommieKender -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Navy SEAL when I was in. That may have changed since then, I've been out for well over a decade.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

"Well over a decade" ago is very different than today.

In 2013, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta removed the military's ban on women serving in combat, overturning the 1994 rule. Panetta's decision gave the military services until January 2016 to seek special exceptions if they believed any positions must remain closed to women. The services had until May 2013 to draw up a plan for opening all units to women and until the end of 2015 to actually implement it.

In December 2015, Defense Secretary Ash Carter stated that starting in 2016 all combat jobs would open to women.

[–] BeardedBlaze 2 points 1 month ago

You're giving squids a bad name. Surely you understood the question refers to present, not the past, right?

[–] Wogi 5 points 1 month ago

I would argue that half the army recruits can only do two out of the three of those, and half them only one at a time.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They worked hard! They deserve to be appreciated!