this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
179 points (97.4% liked)

politics

18936 readers
2745 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s presidential campaign has come under fire for its latest advert attacking Kamala Harris’ pro-trans views, once again parroting the former commander-in-chief’s claim that the Democratic nominee is funding gender-affirming surgeries for “illegal aliens”.

The advert was posted on Trump's social media channels on Friday (20 September), repeating his claims that Harris supports taxpayer-funded gender-affirming care for prisoners and undocumented immigrants.

The ad, branded "trans panic" by social media users, ends with the tagline: "Kamala is for they/them. President Trump is for you."

GLAAD president and chief executive Sarah Kate Ellis responded by telling The Advocate: "This reeks of desperation.... [voters have] "repeatedly rejected candidates who target transgender people and have strongly stated that they want extremists out of our doctors' offices and private lives.


🗳️ Register to vote: https://vote.gov/

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 51 minutes ago

This from a man that paints his face orange, with a running mate rumored to use eyeliner. Are we sure Trump isn't trans? This could be more projection.

[–] Raiderkev 3 points 1 hour ago

They are giving transgender operations to illegal aliens. I heard it on the TV

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I can't tell if they think transition surgeries are a good thing they want to stop immigrants from getting, or a bad thing being forced on unsuspecting children.

[–] Blum0108 3 points 1 hour ago

Well, you see, immigrants are all bad and inherently illegal, and trans people are bad and they are trying to make them illegal. If somehow you started creating mutant trans immigrant hybrids, then the fabric of society would tear like some cheap hosiery worn by a Latino drag queen whilst he chases your children.

[–] simplejack 20 points 3 hours ago

Weird. Trump uses male pronouns, but I see 2 or 3 vaginas on his neck.

[–] foggy 54 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Come on and SLAM

If you wanna JAM

[–] Jackcooper 13 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

I'm so thankful with this latest SLAMMING he clearly has no shot of winning.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

No shot of winning the popular vote. But between the electoral college and his rampant election rigging, this election is far from certain.

[–] takeda 6 points 3 hours ago

Check 270towin.com, popularity wise he has no chance. Unfortunately we have electoral college and with that he has 50/50 chance currently.

That's scarily too close.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Do NOT get complacent. He has a very real shot at winning if it is assumed he’s already lost. That’s one of the reasons he got elected the first time.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly I feel it’s even more likely he’s elected this time. The “Hillary hands down” polls were so much wider than any I’m seeing. Unless polling has gotten considerably more accurate, there are going to be a lot of sad and shocked people out there days after the election.

I truly hope my feelings are unjustified but the nation is in big fuckin trouble.

[–] Xenny 1 points 35 minutes ago

Polls were closer in 2020. Polls also don't mean shit. Voting does

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Looking that way. Vote anyway. Let's see if we can break a record of voter turnout and margin of difference. No more of this stupid late night "still 50%/50% results, too close to call" because everyone thought it was a done deal and they didn't need to show up. Amazing how when everyone thinks that, there aren't enough votes..

[–] MrQuallzin 5 points 5 hours ago

Come on and SLAM

And welcome to JAPAN