this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
159 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1253 readers
133 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://dubvee.org/post/1735883

The Department of Justice has amended its antitrust lawsuit against Ticketmaster and Live Nation, alleging that Ticketmaster's introduction of nontransferable tickets and the SafeTix system was primarily intended to stifle competition from rival platforms like StubHub and SeatGeek, rather than merely to reduce ticket fraud. "The complaint, which was amended on Monday after 10 states joined the DOJ's lawsuit, cites internal Ticketmaster documents obtained during the legal process," notes The Verge. From the report:

In 2019, Ticketmaster rolled out SafeTix, which replaced static barcodes on electronic tickets with encrypted barcodes that refresh every 15 seconds. Ticketmaster marketed SafeTix as a way of reducing ticket fraud, but the complaint claims reducing competition was âoea primary motivationâ for the new ticketing system. [...] The amended complaint includes new information about Ticketmaster's dominance of the events market. One internal Live Nation document cited in the complaint notes that Ticketmaster is the primary ticketer for approximately 80 percent of arenas across the country that host NBA or NHL teams. As of 2022, Live Nation-promoted events accounted for 70 percent of all amphitheater shows across the country, according to internal Live Nation events mentioned in the complaint.

The DOJ alleges that because of Ticketmaster's conduct, consumers have âoepaid more and continue to pay more for fees relating to tickets to live events than they would have paid in a free and open competitive market.â The exact amount of monetary harm is still unknown, the complaint claims, and will require discovery from Ticketmaster and Live Nation's books, as well as from its third-party competitors.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

fuck ticketmaster is really all I have to say

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

My mandatory fuck ticketmaster comment. I wont be in peace until it's burns to the ground.

[–] count_dongulus 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

I actually feel like the safetix thing was a good way to combat scalping. Sucks that the tickets are still expensive and a lot of the money goes to TicketMaster, but it's not the technology causing the high prices. Venues need to step up and tell TicketMaster to suck it when TicketMaster wants them to be the exclusive ticket distributor.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago

Most of the big venues are owned by Livenation. Unfortunately, in 2010 Livenation merged with ticketmaster and somehow the DOJ approved it. Because of this short of legal action Ticketmaster exclusivity is here to stay.

Personally, I'm happy with tickets being non-transferable. If so much of the demand is scalpers this cuts them out of the picture entirely.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately it wasn't a very good attempt at it. It's been completely reverse engineered already and the "secret" to generate the changing barcodes is sent to the buyer with every purchase. So anyone can generate the dynamic barcodes at will. 404 Media did a good write up on it recently.

https://www.404media.co/scalpers-are-working-with-hackers-to-liberate-non-transferable-tickets-from-ticketmasters-ecosystem/

[–] count_dongulus 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wow, TIL. That's hilariously inept. I should not have expected any better from TicketMaster I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

That was pretty much my reaction while reading it too, haha.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Gotta sign up to read the article :(

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Ah, they did add that block AI scraping.

The TLDR version of it is the changing barcode is done the same way the six digit OTP codes from an authenticator app. They send the secret required to generate the codes to the app, rather than individual codes. So when they buy the ticket, they can generate all rotating barcodes the same way the app does.

[–] jumjummy 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Tickets should always be non-transferable with some minor exceptions. Fuck Ticketmaster, it fuck scalpers even more. They add nothing to the ticket buying process other than increasing costs.

Almost like car salesmen.

[–] SirDerpy 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Because some corporation is abusing scalping you propose we can no longer sell what we own.

I suggest we kill the corporation and keep our rights.

[–] curse_of_yig 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yes, 100%

Ticket master isn't responsible for tickets selling out immidiately and prices going up 100-1000% on stubhub. Scalpers are responsible for that. The only way to eradicate that market is to force tickets to be non transferable. And it's not even a novel concept. There's plenty of things you cant resell.

[–] SirDerpy 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Corporate scalpers. A corporation holding venues hostage for ticket sales. These aren't humans. Limit the rights of the corporations fucking over humans instead of the humans. It's not a novel concept, over 150 years since it was explained at length.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Man, I wish more places would do this; the current prices just aren't worth it, I'd rather go to a bar or city run concert with some groups for casual hangouts and then stream the expensive stuff