this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
137 points (98.6% liked)

News

23415 readers
4195 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Generation X and millennials are at an increased risk of developing certain cancers compared with older generations," reports the Washington Post, "a shift that is probably due to generational changes in diet, lifestyle and environmental exposures, a large new study suggests."

Researchers from the American Cancer analyzed data from more than 23.5 million patients who had been diagnosed with 34 types of cancer from 2000 to 2019 — and also studied mortality data that included 7 million deaths in the U.S. from 25 types of cancer among people ages 25 to 84. [The researchers reported] that cancer rates for 17 of the 34 most common cancers are increasing in progressively younger generations. The findings included:

  • Cancers with the most significant increased risk are kidney, pancreatic and small intestine, which are two to three times as high for millennial men and women as baby boomers.
  • Millennial women also are at higher risk of liver and bile duct cancers compared with baby boomers.
  • Although the risk of getting cancer is rising, for most cancers, the risk of dying of the disease stabilized or declined among younger people. But mortality rates increased for gallbladder, colorectal, testicular and uterine cancers, as well as for liver cancer among younger women.

"It is a concern," said Ahmedin Jemal, senior vice president of the American Cancer Society's surveillance and health equity science department, who was the senior author of the study. If the current trend continues, the increased cancer and mortality rates among younger people may "halt or even reverse the progress that we have made in reducing cancer mortality over the past several decades," he added.

While there is no clear explanation for the increased cancer rates among younger people, the researchers suggest that there may be several contributing factors, including rising obesity rates; altered microbiomes from unhealthy diets high in saturated fats, red meat and ultra-processed foods or antibiotic use; poor sleep; sedentary lifestyles; and environmental factors, including exposure to pollutants and carcinogenic chemicals.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 77 points 3 months ago (2 children)

40+ years of eroding safety regulations in the US will do that.

[–] UnpopularCrow 55 points 3 months ago

This. The article reads like Millennials are choosing unhealthy lifestyles. In reality, they work two jobs at a desk resulting in no sleep and a lack of exercise. Then after they pay the boomers social security checks that they will never see themselves, are forced to eat shit food because it costs twice as much to eat healthy. And of course the last sentence, that suggests that maybe the mountain of microplastics and other pollutants may have something to do with the rising rates. Yea, no shit.

[–] pwalshj 13 points 3 months ago

It's what Reagan wanted.

[–] Snapz 17 points 3 months ago

Millennials: "Throw it on the pile please, we'll get to it eventually."

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While there is no clear explanation for the increased cancer rates among younger ~~people~~ microplastic bio-vessels [...]

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Microplastics certainly are an issue but they aren't the only one. Don't let big businesses convince you it's the biggest issue for us like food companies blame shifted to fats to deflect from sugars. There's a lot of shit awful in the world.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And forever chemicals in everything! And pesticides! And less nutritional value in healthy food!

[–] Raiderkev 14 points 3 months ago

Not born in time to buy a house and live comfortably in a big house on a high school diploma, born just in time to get cancer at an early age.

This is fine

[–] rayyy 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Older people got 100% trans-fat drenched food and died from heart attacks. Younger people get cancer from glyphosate contaminated food. Progress?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

So, increase research spending on artificial replacement hearts and bring back trans fats? lol

I like the sound of that delicious new-old world.

[–] Etterra 3 points 3 months ago

Eh, this is fine. I may be Gen-X but I've got all my chips on heart disease, baby. Nice and quick if I do it right. And if not, well I do live in America. There's plenty of ways to fix partial paralysis in the event of a non-lethal stroke.

[–] TheBigBrother -1 points 3 months ago

Seems pretty reasonable at least for me.

[–] LustyArgonianMana -2 points 3 months ago

Of course, try to convince many of them to give up processed meats and they freak. Gotta love bacon-derived ass cancer