this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
187 points (99.0% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

947 readers
398 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 93 points 5 months ago (2 children)

72 years old and one shots a drone with a 9mm.

As dumb and dangerous as that is, I'm pretty impressed. That's a hell of a (lucky?) shot.

[–] shalafi 21 points 5 months ago (2 children)

At 75'?! I sure couldn't do that. Not without birdshot.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

With one shot too, that is a hell of a shot of a moving target. Reminds me of that mall shooter that a guy hit like 10 times from 50 yards with a pistol.

[–] LemmyKnowsBest 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] MinorLaceration 10 points 5 months ago

It was 75 feet in the air.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago

My grandfather could shoot like that past 80, but he was a competitive shooter in the Navy and in civilian life. It takes skill to pop a moving target with any handgun.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Good aim! The privacy concern with these things is real. The full opportunity is now there to have these fly up to your window and look into your house. Hard pass on drone deliveries.
Drones can also carry weapons, biohazards, waste, endless possibilities of exploitation, imho.

[–] RedditWanderer 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And how do I know this drone above my house is legit? Do i get airspace traffic control over my house? If someone is flying a drone near my roof it's going to explode for sure.

[–] Droggelbecher 13 points 5 months ago

There's plenty of great applications, but it needs to be heavily regulated to not be a privacy nightmare.

Maybe also give certified drones a specific bright colour that privately owned ones can't have so you know it's not some creep or creepy advertising company operating it.

Because it's much better to deliver like this than have the city clogged up and polluted by cars delivering a tiny bag of food. Even more important, medications that are needed urgently or just for someone that's too sick or elderly or disabled to comfortably pick it up themselves.

[–] Noblesavage 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How is this different from a delivery person looking in your window when they drop off something to your house? Can a delivery person also just as easily "carry weapons, biohazards, waste"? Why would a drone want to carry those things? Why would Walmart want a drone to carry those things and cause harm, as you seem to be implying here, to their customers? A drone company can be regulated and audited to make sure privacy laws are being followed.

Will an infraction occur with a drone? Probably. And then people will have grounds to sue and laws will be built to protect people and their privacy (I hope!).

Drone delivery is coming - how do you want to see this tech being used responsibly?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TenderfootGungi 3 points 5 months ago

They physically can, but spying on you via drone in someplace you have a reasonable expectation of privacy (I.e. your house, not the sidewalk or public space) is already illegal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I fly drones for about 12 years. I flying (racing) drones. It's fun and an interesting hobby. But i absolutely hate the thought of these delivery drones. I honestly don't think looking into windows and stuff like that is a concern.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Veraxus 28 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

You don’t shoot at things in public, you don’t shoot into the air near populated/occupied areas, and you don’t shoot at things that don’t belong to you or you aren’t licensed to shoot at. Clearly the thing wasn’t anywhere near his property, so he’ll probably get off light considering how reckless and irresponsible this was.

[–] grue 22 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You sure about that "getting off light" part? The article says he was charged with a felony punishable by up to 20 years in prison.

[–] frunch 24 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yep, according to the article shooting the drone carries the same sentencing as shooting at a commercial airliner 👀 they are taking that shit very seriously

[–] Kiwi 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I wonder how that works in Deer Trail Colorado where they legalized drone hunting?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Veraxus 9 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I mean, we’re talking about Florida.

But given that fact, it’s probably more dependent on whether it was a white or black drone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Shooting at a drone has the same classification as shooting at a passenger plane. He's been charged with a felony, up to 20 years in prison. As it should be. We don't need fucking idiots shooting into the sky in residential areas, regardless of what they think they're shooting at.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You think someone shooting a drone -- a thing that by definition doesn't have any people in it -- should have the same law and sentencing applied as shooting a plane full of people? That seems pretty different to me.

[–] BeardedBlaze 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

You think a 54 lb drone crashing from the sky isn't potentially deadly to people?

[–] Veraxus 3 points 4 months ago

Or bullets falling from the sky.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr 1 points 5 months ago

Yup. Because whether there are people or not, I don't think, is actually relevant to the crime being committed.

I also think attempted murder, and successful murder should have the same sentence. Whether it was successful shouldn't matter for the punishment. They shouldn't get off with a lighter sentence just because they did a shit job, or because the person was too tough to die.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago

The time has come

We must defend Florida Man

[–] ooli 16 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If he got caught, the drone was probably really spying on him

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

I mean it's not like it would be hard to figure out where it got shot from if you know its last known position and rotation

[–] BeardedBlaze 4 points 5 months ago

You could read the article...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (4 children)

He doesn't even need a lawyer. As long as he gets a jury trial he could plead his own case and get acquited. No one wants these things hovering over their property.

[–] Arbiter 41 points 5 months ago (1 children)

lol no, he absolutely needs a lawyer

[–] NatakuNox 20 points 5 months ago (1 children)

And remember it's always shut the fuck up Friday

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do you say when the cops first pull you over? "Why'd you pull me over?"

And when they start asking questions? "I'm not discussing my day."

And if they keep asking questions? "Am I being detained, or am I free to go?"

And if detained, what do you say? "I invoke the fifth."

And then what do you do??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Shut the fuck up.

Yep, that's what you do. Don't answer questions.

If they were going to arrest you, they've already made that decision and there's nothing you can do about it. Let it get settled in court.

[–] remer 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Lawyers know courtroom procedure. The defendant may have a valid argument but navigating the court process really does take an attorney.

[–] ASeriesOfPoorChoices 4 points 5 months ago

The person who ordered the delivery does.

[–] Sweetpeaches69 1 points 4 months ago
load more comments
view more: next ›