this post was submitted on 11 May 2024
36 points (95.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5316 readers
908 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

The article doesn't really do a great job of answering the titular question. So ... Is the answer "mostly because of policy failure"? Because that is what opening two coal plants in 2024 sounds like to me.

I'm also a little confused how they managed to jump from "renewables are making power cheaper in Japan" in one paragraph to "this is hampered by G7 liking fossil gas" in the next paragraph. (I do share their worry about G7 nations investing in fossil gas too much. My home country Germany has just introduced a gas peaker plant strategy and appears to be over-investing in LNG terminals.)

[โ€“] RelativeArea0 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

NCD here lmao

Why? Because of russia, after CIA found that russia (and its allies) may go full craycray and is not ashamed to show that they have infiltrated US politics.

If an all out war pulled out and these nutbags decided to target nuclear plants, Then guess what? Nuclear waste is pain to clean, remember fukushima? They cost like 200B USD (probably corrupted, but whatever)

Take note, these countries returning to monke energy generation (also germany) are US "allies and bussiness partners" and relying on "western monetary system" i hope that make sense now

Russia has always had a bad beef with japan (1904 war) and germany(almost invaded in ww2), imagine being clapped before and some decades later, got paired with an "ultra nationalist" (facist, if you want me to be direct) leader/s and some of its constituents, then welcome to current russia.