Last I read, Microsoft had $80 billion in cash on hand. I'm pretty sure they have the resources to run whatever the fuck they want.
this post was submitted on 10 May 2024
219 points (98.7% liked)
PC Gaming
8660 readers
771 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I think the "Microsoft dilemma" is between Making Some Money vs. Take All The Money.
If they publish a bunch of successful games on Steam or on Playstation, they will make Some Money, compared to games published exclusive to Xbox, where they can make All The Money.
By acquiring studios they are making sure that good franchises "don't make all the money... yet" (on competing platform like Steam, Playstation or Switch, but also Android/iOS)
They could make good games exclusive for Xbox, but given how relatively unsuccessful is the Xbox platform, compared to Switch and Playstation, it would mean that very expensive (to make) games will bleed money
So it's almost like the smart business decision would be to make some multiplatform games, huh
Get out of here! Microsoft doesn't need this! They needs the mooney? Please won't somebody think of Microsoft?!
I think the "Microsoft dilemma" is just called capitalism. If you're not making all the money, you're losing the game.
I wonder if regulators will bring this up the next time Microsoft wants to buy another publisher. They fought tooth-and-nail to buy Activision Blizzard and like a child that got a new toy they're throwing out the old ones.
It's secretly benefiting the smaller game studios because Microsoft is basically giving up marketshare. The real question is whether MS wants to buy any more studios.
With all the money they'll save from shutting down all the smaller studios they can just go out and buy more.
Benefits how? I feel like gaming is going to become like the startup sector where companies create something to specifically get acquired by a big company.
Like it's becoming so prevalent for these big gaming publishers to vacuum up IP and sit on it, it's just the Disney-fication of gaming.
Well then, maybe they shouldn't have bought them to begin them?
I agree. But these days having an IP prints money. Especially an IP as popular as minecraft, fallout, elder scrolls, call of duty, warcraft, Diablo and doom.
Yes, but it is also possible to buy the IP without buying the company.
But then you miss out on the residuals from the already released stuff
Cheaper though a bigger issue would be releasing competing games
Like Halo vs Destiny. Had they just folded Bungie they wouldn’t have to deal with it
I wouldn't call Halo and Destiny competing. They are vastly different. The only thing they have in common is that they're both FPSes.
But you could argue halo players would go to play/try it due to brand recognition
I’m sure there are no bungie fans left but when it came out people would be curious
Also advertising wise my first reaction seeing it on the telly was “this looks like halo, this looks like halo” and so on for every scene in the advert
Well of course not. These game studios were selling games at 60-80$ each. Microsoft bought them, then started providing the all the games for a flat fee of 15$ per month.
I assumed their strategy was to lose money in the medium term while they worked on getting people used to playing games on subscription. Where they make their money back is when they stop outright selling games at full price and make them only available on subscription, and then they slowly start increasing that monthly subscription cost.
In order for that to work they need a large library and like 5-10 years.
Turns out corporations can manage long term planning when the plan reduces quality of life for customers. Crazy!
No joke, their plan was to have 100m subscribers so the economics start making sense
It's $9 for the standard Game Pass, and was $1 a month until they stopped that last year sometime.
And the studios didn't run themselves before the purchases?
Is Microsofts PR AI that bad at dumb excuses?
Yeah, they needed a shitload of money to pay Bobby Kotick apparently.
As a gamer who has owned every Xbox from the OG to a Xbox One S, I just don't understand Microsoft's strategy for this generation. Vanishingly few console exclusives, and most of those shipped on PC, too. As someone with a decent PC and enough income to buy 2-3 consoles per gen, they just haven't given me a reason to buy an Xbox Series console.
I know they hoped to sell Game Pass to PC only players, but without the lock-in of a console, there's just no incentive to buy it over a PS Plus subscription and individually buying the exclusives I want on PC.
Now they're burning bridges with players by closing down beloved developers, even if their last title was successful. I wonder what Ninja Theory devs are thinking with Hellblade 2 a couple weeks out.
I bet they're currently shitting bricks
Why? There's been so much marketing for Hellblade 2, Xbox have basically guaranteed their success! /s
Xbox President Matt Booty
Matt Booty
Booty
Lol