this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
195 points (97.6% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2666 readers
1 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PumpkinEscobar 94 points 7 months ago (10 children)

These guys are really entertaining. Flat earth people are boring by comparison. Sovcits will use 15 legal and Latin terms they learned from their redneck uncle, cram all of them into a single rage Facebook post not understanding what any of them mean. Wonderful.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They're truly enjoyably bonkers.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] HollandJim 8 points 7 months ago

As they should be. (grabs some popcorn…)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

Forget the Facebook rage. Hit up YouTube or your favorite more free alternative and you can watch amazingly confident sovcit nitwits square up against cops and judges.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I love how every sovcit post here could be posted to [email protected]

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 18 points 7 months ago

I need to start cross posting. No reason those folks should miss out.

[–] Zenjal 40 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I swear, I've read a few of these and they sound like they're playing some kinda fantasy tabletop game that's stupid thick with weird rules and builds, and their staring at all of us like "obviously you can mix a hexblade with an abrant mind for optimal spells and subtle spells, and the DM is pissed I got silvery barbs, but I showed him how it's an official spell so they should let me use it, but if i get aspect of the moon I don't have to sleep so I can short rest to replace my spells lots for free and then I can convert...."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neatchee 36 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)

Can anyone actually explain what this person THINKS their rights are here? Like, are they just saying "you can't give me a moving violation fine because I never signed up for that so it's theft and slavery"? Or is there something more nuanced to their argument that I'm missing?

EDIT: Thank you to everyone who has contributed. My big takeaway from this is that sovcits pick and choose which legal language to believe like a modern American Catholic picks and chooses Bible verses to believe. 👍

[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You know how dogs don’t necessarily understand the words you’re saying to get them to do a trick, or why they’re doing the trick? It’s basically that, if dogs thought they could make you do tricks by barking correctly. How much lead exposure factors into it is up for debate.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

a modern incarnation of cargo cult?

[–] FireTower 10 points 7 months ago

You know I've never connected it to SovCits but the cargo cult comparison matches well. With a dash of conspiracy theorizing.

[–] barsquid 21 points 7 months ago (3 children)

When you are born, the government creates a fake corporate entity with your same name. That's the thing that accrues the debts, fines, and jail sentences, not you the person. As long as you never sign a document in black or blue ink they cannot assign those to you because of arcane law stuff.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon 15 points 7 months ago (7 children)

They think that because they do not "create joinder" by accepting the ticket that it doesn't apply to them. They will "rescind" them by sending them back with some nonsense written on it at a 45 degree angle in red ink with a thumbprint and believe that cancels the ticket. Here is an example.

[–] VelvetStorm 11 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Ok, so obviously, this doesn't work, but let's pretend for a second that it does for my following question. Why would the red writing need to be at 45°?

[–] Almrond 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Why are sovcits batshit crazy? Who knows. It is funny picturing a county clerk with a compass and ruler going "It's 44.5°, we got them boys"

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

I would argue the drivers license is the proof of a contract stating you’ll follow the law pertaining to it. The ticket is a penalty for breaking that contract, not a new contract. But I know their lack of understanding logic.

[–] neatchee 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I see. That's... Just so patently false on the face of it. I suppose if people want to believe hard enough, they will.

Not sure how they fail to understand the difference between a notice and an agreement but good luck to them, I suppose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FireTower 12 points 7 months ago

Abstractly, we as people in society abide a social contract. Not a physical document we signed but a general expectation we all hold of each other in how we interact as citizens.

He appears to reject this style of thinking and refuse the consequences of this social contract because it isn't something they've actually consented into, like you would when signing a physical contract.

So to this person this traffic ticket is a debt placed on them by someone with no authority to do so.

Typically it's people who get pulled into this thought process when seeking legal help and are unable to distinguish good advice from bad advice. They join these groups of like minded people and it becomes a blind leading the blind scenario. Or by someone trying to scam them with 'lessons'.

I think it stems from the complex nature of law there's some things that sound so fake that are real that it blurs the lines. For example the US Congress can authorize ordinary people to engage in maritime theft against other nations.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] saltesc 29 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's always these people trespassing on other people's property and then wondering why there's consequences.

It's not even that hard to get permission. Just register for use of the roads, chip in your money to keep them open and running, and you get to use the government's property all you like! Just respect their rules like you would any property owner, and you can ~~drive~~ travel on their roads as much as you need. If it were anyone else's roads, you'd probably get denied and then shot unless you paid a huge access fee. Use of state property is amazingly easy and reasonable.

[–] Almrond 15 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

It's not even being able to use them, anyone has the right to travel on foot or by non-motorized bike. It's specifically driving heavy machinery that can tear up the roads or injure someone you need a license for (ie, a car). Though even then, there are still rules to follow as a pedestrian.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pronell 22 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Calling the judge a burger flipper. That's a good tactic.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 13 points 7 months ago

Judges love that kind of thing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Well, folders do look like 2 slices of cardboard with paper inside, a bit like a paperburger. And judges flip them, yes. These are UNDENIABLE FACTS!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When I’m reading one of these, I never know if it’s the nonsensical rant of a stubborn asshole, or someone who genuinely needs psychiatric help. In other words, I don’t know whether it’s okay to laugh or not.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 10 points 7 months ago (18 children)

I never post the mentally ill ones. You are safe to laugh.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Welp... this post just confirmed to me what I've been suspecting about a friend I've been distancing myself from for years. I didn't realize they call themselves "nationals," so he's definitely a sovcit of the "moorish" variety based on a few things he's said. Progressively more and more fucking exhausting to talk to over the last ten years with the woo woo moronic shit and this is the most recent nonsense.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Definitely a sovcit. Some of them are Moorish Temple adherents, usually they are black. Others call themselves American state nationals or sometimes secured party creditors. Or private citizens is another one.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He is black, and I'm guessing moorish temple based on his comments and other things he's dabbled in. Most of what he dabbles in has roots in black nationalism that I recognize. Funnily enough, there's occasional veiled nazi shit I think he's unaware of, though given the far right nature of it all, I'm not surprised his uninformed ass stumbles across them. What is also strange, I do not think he harbors racial hate, though he may have some homo/transphobia. I'm not entirely sure because I'm not interested in listening to that shit. Though it would fit with the far right pipeline.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sovereign citizens began in a white supremacy group known as Christian Identity in the 1970s so that's not at all a surprise to me. Sovcits are also HUGELY antisemitic and hate LGBT people. Your friend definitely sounds like he fits to me. He's probably in some of the Facebook groups I'm in as some of them are Moorish.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He was permanently banned from Facebook last year, lol. Idk what he did, but he has asked me to create an account for him to eventually take over because I don't have one. I flatly refused and expressed that it is probably best for him anyway. The LGBT hate is definitely an interesting turn for this particular guy, known him twenty years, but given the slow spiral I've watched, I'm not surprised. Last time we talked, he mentioned "learning more history," but he quickly followed it up with "but I'm done trying to convince people" before I could respond. I wanted to ask if that was a promise, goddamn.

[–] BonesOfTheMoon 6 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Probably means Black's law dictionary which is their favourite tome of crazy laws they refer to. I probably have ran across him in my sovcit travels.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's roleplay. These people are roleplaying administrative skills, with fantasy names and concepts

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago

Peter Griffin seceding from the USA and establishing Petoria made more sense than sovcits do.

[–] Rookwood 8 points 7 months ago (2 children)

I was reading that as Soviet Citizen.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

In Soviet Russia, contract refuses you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] veni_vedi_veni 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Sovcit: people who live in a society who believe they are entitled to all its privileges without any of the responsibilities

[–] PorradaVFR 6 points 7 months ago

That’ll show ‘em! Sure.

load more comments
view more: next ›