this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
693 points (96.9% liked)

memes

10482 readers
5426 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bassman1805 125 points 7 months ago (4 children)

His name is canonically Mario Mario. His brother is Luigi Mario.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 7 months ago

What a wild fuckin movie

[–] samus12345 38 points 7 months ago (3 children)

In that case, this is canonically a goomba:

And those Mario games with the little mushroom guys are just fanfiction.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

But it all makes like a weird amount of sense. I mean Mario also isn't made of weird pixelated legos, either. It's like the writers were shown some stills from the game and told the basic story and then dropped acid.

[–] samus12345 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I can see Yoshi being a raptor or even Dennis Hopper as Bowser since he's supposedly an evolved dinosaur, but how do you go from an anthropomorphic mushroom with just a head and feet to a reptilian humanoid with a tiny head?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

Oh easily! They got high and confused koopa and goomba I think.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We know that SMB3 was a play but we don't know that the other games in the series weren't. The 1993 movie might be the only truly canon entry in the franchise.

[–] samus12345 2 points 7 months ago

Somewhere there's a reality where that's true. I just hope it isn't this one!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

I approve of this

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Are Wario and Waluigi Marios?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Funny enough, I don't think Wario and Waluigi are ever said to be siblings. Waluigi just kinda... showed up to a tennis match one day and then stuck around.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago

I really like the game theory to that

The baby versions of most mario characters, including Wario, were canonically stolen by Kamek in yoshi Island 2. At the end of the game, all children are returned to their parents expect for Wario, who steals all the gold of the island and flees with a raft

So the theory would be that Wario was waluigis brother but went missing as a child, and the two are just not realizing it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 7 months ago

It amazes me that he's been in 50 different games, but never as a primary antagonist or mini-boss.

[–] samus12345 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, and they're also not related to each other.

[–] Bassman1805 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'm convinced that they're lovers.

[–] samus12345 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

So wait, Imma need to have this explained to me.

I get that they're "roommates", in the historical sense. They should be, that's lovely, but...

What's actually about wapeach and wadaisy? What is there to understand?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

My guess: Peach and Daisy exist as love interests for Mario and Luigi, but Wario and Waluigi already are each other's love interests

[–] samus12345 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This exactly.

[–] roguetrick 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

wapeach and wadaisy are roommates too, but they specifically have personalities that make them not prone to shit like getting kidnapped to be a plot point or competing in death races, so you never hear about them. Ones a social worker.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

That's not canon.

Edit: Out of curiosity, if you're downvoting me, are you downvoting because you disagree, or because the person meant it to be a joke? In the former case, it's both common sense and also Miyamoto said as much. In the latter case, there's no indication whatsoever that it's a joke, so would I have been wrong to "miss the joke"?

Knee-jerk, tribalistic reaction is dumb.

[–] kraftpudding 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Just fyi, I'm downvoting you solely because of the edit.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago
[–] Dagnet 76 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no, you used Nintendo property to make a meme, get ready to get sued

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You think Nintendo has trademarked the name Mario? Wouldn't surprise me if they tried.

[–] Dagnet 4 points 7 months ago

Nintendo lawyers would sue us for the air we breathe if they could

[–] olafurp 65 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Japanese name order is family first. So Itsumi is his family name

[–] logicbomb 30 points 7 months ago

Also, strange to bring up name order at all when it has nothing to do with the joke they presented.

It makes me wonder if they badly retold a joke they heard where the original punchline was that his name was Mario Itsumi.

In Japan, Itsumi is actually a common name, either as a family name or as a girl's given name.

[–] DrSleepless 50 points 7 months ago

It's sue me, Mario

[–] unreachable 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 2 points 7 months ago

Stupid sexy Mario