A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
I can't say I know a lot about cloning. But isn't it already an established thing? Aren't people cloning their favourite pets and polo horses already? What's the main difference with this older method, why bother with it?
They are trying a different method of cloning to determine if it's better than what was used with dolly the sheep.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A “healthy” rhesus monkey cloned in China has survived for more than two years and is providing “valuable insights” into the scientific process, according to researchers.
Scientists in China used a modified version of the same technique that was used to create Dolly the sheep, the world’s first cloned mammal.
Commenting on the findings, Dr Lluis Montoliu, a researcher at the National Centre for Biotechnology in Spain, who was not involved in the study, said: “Both the cloning of crab-eating macaques and rhesus monkeys demonstrate two things.
It was the first time scientists had managed to clone a mammal from an adult cell, taken from the udder of a Finn Dorset sheep.
The researchers said this approach proved to be more successful, leading to a healthy male rhesus monkey, which has now survived for more than two years.
Writing in the journal Nature Communications, the authors said: “These discoveries provide valuable insights into the reprogramming mechanism of monkey SCNT and introduce a promising strategy for primate cloning.”
The original article contains 598 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Ethical quarries aside, would the clone make the same decisions as the original given the same circumstances? Could this be a test to see if we have free will or just running biological programming?
Would be an interesting test.
We have that test, in the form of identical twins. They happen when a single embryo splits into 2. The 2 babies are generically identical. They are also often raised in almost exactly the same conditions, which makes their study even more useful.
What is even more interesting to me is epigenetic studies on monozygotic twins. As twins age, their DNA can begin to alter thru epigenetics (environmental impacts on DNA), such as if one twin smokes cigarettes and the other abstains.
The identical twins can become less 'identical' throughout the span of their lives. Here's an article on the subject.
Edit: Here's an accessible scholarly article with more information.
Given that the brains develop differently even in clones, it wouldn't mean much
What about the humans that were cloned? You know, the ones you kept secret? How are they doing?
Or is this the ‘soft tell’ that it’s going well?
Keriger was to marry 宮住 美津子 but Lana had to fuck that up so not so well I guess.
I'm not sure why you're downvoted. It's China. If they can do it, you know they are. But the question is whether they can. I imagine cloning sheep and small monkeys are much easier than cloning humans.