this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2024
111 points (95.9% liked)

politics

19148 readers
4073 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hard to tell whose smug expression is the least likeable.

[–] tootoughtoremember 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I'm not sure if Mitch is looking smug here, honestly just looks blank

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

He looks like he just spotted a particularly plump lettuce leaf.

[–] thesporkeffect 3 points 10 months ago
[–] splicerslicer 4 points 10 months ago

He's just glitching out again, probably saw the reaper tapping his watch impatiently again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

It’s Weekend at Bernie’s 3: Capitol Hill

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Does Mike Johnson use blush to make his cheeks rosier? Why does he always look like an old ventriloquist's dummy or a little dough boy or something? I can't quite put my finger on it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

Dude probably whips himself every night to atone for sins, so I wouldn't be surprised by anything weird he does.

[–] CADmonkey 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

He's just really, really horny because he has to work in a situation that has hum surrounded by old white men. And that's perfectly fine, he should embrace it, no matter what his imaginary friend says.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

fuck all Republicans, they're all in the pockets of the Russians and Saudis

[–] [email protected] -3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I wanted to comment on the title of the article and the fact that it is gramatically incorrect. Why didn't they use the word "invites"? The article uses the word in the first sentence. It's hard for me to enjoy journalism when it's filled with distracting mistakes like this. When your profession is writing why are these kind of mistakes allowed. If I made mistakes analogous to this in my career I would not be keeping my job very long.

[–] PumaStoleMyBluff 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's less common, but valid. "Ask to lunch", "Ask to prom".

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago

I'll give you the second exception but I've never seen the first one used. However, you are missing the fact that in both of your examples you can use the subject as an action. To lunch is to eat lunch and to prom is the shorted version of promenade. White House is a proper noun and cannot be used the same way as your two examples.