this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
1061 points (98.2% liked)

World News

39173 readers
3908 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukraine plinking a Russian GPS-jammer with a GPS-guided bomb. Ukrainian drones blowing up Russian drone-jammers. Ukraine’s cruise missiles striking Russian air-defense sites whose missions include, you guessed it, shooting down cruise missiles.

Russia’s 23-month wider war on Ukraine has seen a lot of ironic, darkly-hilarious clashes. The latest was also one of the quickest between setup and punchline.

On Tuesday morning, Russian media announced the deployment, to Ukraine, of Russian forces’ latest high-tech counterbattery radar. A few hours later in southern Ukraine, the Ukrainians blew it up ... with artillery rockets.

The irony deepens. In theory, a Russian Yastreb-AV radar would help to protect Russian troops from Ukraine’s American-made High-Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems launchers—its HIMARS. Now guess what the Ukrainians used to destroy that first Yastreb-AV.

That’s right: HIMARS.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 159 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What a novel way to detect artillery

[–] EdibleFriend 36 points 11 months ago

I'm picturing the droid in rogue One

There's some.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] INeedMana 147 points 11 months ago

What’s as big as a house, burns 20 liters of fuel every hour, puts out a shit-load of smoke and noise, and cuts an apple into three pieces?

A Soviet machine made to cut apples into four pieces!

[–] ghostdoggtv 102 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Now they know there's artillery. Test successful.

[–] Viking_Hippie 10 points 11 months ago

Next they're gonna test for cruise missiles again.

[–] FishFace 93 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The counter-battery radar doesn't prevent artillery from working; it makes it dangerous for them. Theoretically the units that took this out could already be destroyed after having had their coordinates calculated and counter-battery fire immediately called down on them.

In practice it was just setting up, having been tracked to its location, and possibly wasn't working yet. Also the GMLRS rockets fired by HIMARS are not ballistic - they execute a counter-battery-confounding turn. And the salvo is fired quickly after which the vehicle immediately leaves - it can park, get ready and fire a full salvo in under a minute. When the first rocket is detected a couple of minutes later, the launcher will already have driven off and counter-battery coordinates will not be that useful/

[–] [email protected] 53 points 11 months ago (5 children)

To add to that, this war has shown the importance of shoot-and-scoot. Towed artillery with long setup and teardown times are too vulnerable to drones. Might be the end of an era for towed artillery.

[–] Rednax 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The same holds for radar. A radar literally shines a light that anyone looking for it can see. Pinpointing a radar is trivial. Mobile radars can't stay and detect from a location for very long, without risking an artillery strike. Fast setup and teardown times are crucial, along with a strategy where multiple mobile radars cover for each other, so detection is never offline for long.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

For some radar. This is actually the biggest gap between western capabilities and Russian - Russia does not make proper digital AESAs, which are very critical for LPD operation. If you only transmit in scanning pencil beams, it is extremely difficult to locate you.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AutistoMephisto 10 points 11 months ago

Speed is the essence of war, and speed has definitely been the deciding factor. That and logistics. Last I read, Russia was still supplying their military with unpalletized, man-portable crates that take teams of men hours to unload, while Ukraine has their goods loaded onto pallets that take a couple guys with forklifts a couple minutes to get off the trucks and to the people who need them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

On the other hand the artillery mounted on trucks seems to be quite effective.

Stuff like the Caesar can park, fire 6 shells and leave in less than 3 minutes.

[–] Madison420 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What? Ukraine is effectively using towed artillery, Russia isn't really using anything effectively so there's an argument for them I guess.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Anarch157a 11 points 11 months ago

Even if it was fully operational, Western artillery used by Ukraine is more precise with longer range than Russian, so they can target the ruskies with less risk.

[–] mrfriki 82 points 11 months ago (4 children)

It detects artillery, it doesn’t deflect it.

[–] Siegfried 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Ironic, he could save others from death, but not himself

[–] beebarfbadger 15 points 11 months ago

Just like rain on your wedding day...

[–] Kbobabob 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Probably had a great view the whole way in. I'm silly laughing right now thinking about some Russians just watching this missile come in on an old ass CRT monitor.

[–] 100_percent_a_bot 32 points 11 months ago

You see, this is why the westoids always underestimate the glorious Russians. Even when their system is hit, it is still reporting the artillery by sending a smoke sign that is visible for kilometers - we never stood a chance

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind 67 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Apparently Russia called for a meeting of the UN Security Council to complain about Ukraine fighting back

LOL no fair when you fight back, it's violence! /s

[–] Plopp 23 points 11 months ago

They called it terrorism even lol

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Ibex0 53 points 11 months ago (5 children)

It would be better if Ukraine was regaining territory.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why? Because they're defending against massive waves of badly trained unsupported conscripts right now with extremely favorable loss ratios?

[–] Crashumbc 19 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Because ultimately, Ukraine cannot support a stalemate forever. Eventually, they'll lose international support and just won't be able to replace the troops.

Even a casual history buff would understand Russia is culturally willing to accept losses far beyond what any other modern country(with the exception of China) would ever consider or whose populace would support. Russia has historically thrived in attrition scenarios.

Honestly, their only real hope is for either Putin to die and resulting political shake up to be favorable. Or to start winning decisive victories and force Russia to the table (more unlikely).

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets 15 points 11 months ago

One step at a time. It’ll take time for the blyats to figure out this shit isn’t worth it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Well it was very successful in detecting artillery

[–] recapitated 11 points 11 months ago

Artillery attractant

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Duamerthrax 51 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (11 children)

I was a counter battery radar operator. The systems I used 20 years ago had these neat things called electronic counter measures. I guess russia never got the message that it's not a smart idea to radiate in a zone with anti-radiation missiles.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This wasn't a seeker missile, it was GPS guided. If the Russian machine had been fully set up then they probably would have blocked it, however Ukraine got to it before they were ready.

[–] [email protected] 54 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

That makes it even worse. Why didn't they set up at night and throw up some camo netting? There are ways to lessen the chances your radar is blown up is all I'm saying. The ruzzians are morons exhibit #4,832.

Edit:

This was tucked away at the bottom of the article:

It’s possible the Ukrainians knew where to look for the Yastreb-AV because the truck-mounted phased-array radar emitted a distinctive signal—one Ukrainian intelligence may have had on file.

So they probably did radiate at the wrong time and paid for it.

[–] Brainsploosh 24 points 11 months ago (3 children)

From the video it seems they were spotted by drones on the way to the deployment site and were under drone surveillance during setup, during which artillery hit.

I have a hard time imagining that the observation drones are that sneaky, so I'd guess it's another issue of poor battlefield command structure forcing the compromised position

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Drones are cheap and thus everywhere in the battlefield. It costs more $$$ to show a drone down then the drone is worth (in general). Modern military is still trying to figure out how to handle all the cheap enemy drones overhead, there is - so far and to my knowledge - no good answer (of course if there was a good answer it would be classified at least until the enemy figures out what you are doing and so I wouldn't know).

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago

Lmao, love to see it

[–] MushuChupacabra 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I just saw the clip of the thing getting deployed, then getting blown up real good. It was awesome.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

well, don't keep a thing like to yourself. if you have links, bring enough for everyone!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago

Russians engineers are hardcore, they really go all out on systems validation.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Seems to be pretty effective at detecting that there's artillery within range.

Even to the point of being able to detect how precise it can hit.

[–] fne8w2ah 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And many more Conscriptoviches, Korruptnikovs, Korruptoviches and Korruptovs are going to get sent into the insane stalemated meat grinder that is the "special military operation".

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's on putin, not on Ukr.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rapidcreek 11 points 11 months ago

Good gunners those Ukrainians

[–] toasteecup 9 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Anyone else, here read, the title in Christopher Walken's voice?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›