this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
2810 points (97.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35606 readers
1424 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rob_t_firefly 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Something I was dearly hoping wouldn't find its way over here from Reddit: screenshots of posts which erase the posters' identity for no good reason.

Giving proper credit for content is cool, kids.

[–] R51 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... nah. Doxxing is not cool kids.

[–] ElectroNeutrino 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a difference between retaining the twitter handle of the person that publicly posted their conversation, and doxxing them.

[–] R51 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yeah there's also a difference in someone who is expecting private messages to stay private only to then have your handle get attention in a bigass community, did u forget the linked pic this thread is about lol

[–] ElectroNeutrino 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Wait, so you're saying that someone publicly posting screenshots of their conversation expects the screenshots to stay private? Or do you honestly think that keeping the twitter handle will dox the other person in the conversation where their name isn't visible in the first place?

Additionally, it's not hard to find the original tweet by looking up the text. It took me all of 15 seconds.

[–] R51 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

im so confused. I thought a guy was saying the original poster should have unblocked the name of the guy being weird with his song, i was saying that would be bad

[–] ElectroNeutrino 1 points 1 year ago

Ohh. That makes sense. I completely agree with that. I thought you were talking about the person that posted the screenshot originally.

[–] required 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In reddit, not blurring the person can lead to the comment section being angry at the person for some reason and in that case the person will get death threats in the best case scenario. There are many past examples of this. So all names remotely related to the real discussion (like here) better be removed.
Maybe Lemmy would be cooler than that but I'm not sure.

[–] rob_t_firefly 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the "look at this foolish person posting something showing how stupid they are" situations that's the case and it makes sense. In "this person openly posted content you think is good enough to repost but are removing the indicator of their rightful ownership from" situations it's not cool.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but not in a private conversation

[–] rob_t_firefly 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An open post to their socials like this is not a private conversation.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh I see you mean the person who posted the convo screenshot. The girl in the circle pic.

[–] rob_t_firefly 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's right. That person shared this and their username should have been left on it.