this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024

425 points (99.3% liked)

News

23424 readers

4496 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

425

Ted Cruz, US senator mocked for flight to Cancún, seeks airport police escorts (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave to c/news

54 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Republican senator, who flew to Mexico as Texas faced deadly cold snap, complains of ‘serious security threats’ to lawmakers

The Texas Republican senator Ted Cruz, who achieved viral infamy in 2021 when he was seen at Houston airport for a flight to Cancún even as his state faced a historic and deadly spell of cold weather, this week moved a step closer to securing police escorts for lawmakers at airports.

Under an amendment to the Federal Aviation Authority Reauthorization bill introduced by Cruz, members of Congress and other prominent officials, and some family and staff members, will be offered security escorts if they are deemed “currently … or previously … the subject of a threat, as determined by such applicable federal protective agency”.

If passed by the House and Senate, the bill will fund the FAA for four years.

But given Cruz’s scrape with viral fame over his flight to Mexico in February 2021 – a trip to join a family vacation he abandoned after one day, admitting his “obvious mistake” as tweets and memes proliferated – the senator faces criticism and mockery over his attempt to secure security guards for future airport trips.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LesserAbe 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Agree.

Many politicians suck, and it's not good that they're insulated from public feedback. I think some people feel like harassing Ted Cruz at the airport is the only way he's ever going to hear what they have to say, so they don't want to have taxpayer money going to protect him.

But for those people imagine the flip side: some Jan 6er assholes harassing AOC or Bernie at the airport. There are enough people from any walk of life or viewpoint to mob a politician at an airport.

[–] FlyingSquid 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But for those people imagine the flip side: some Jan 6er assholes harassing AOC or Bernie at the airport.

I am absolutely fine with that. They are citizens. They should have the right to approach elected officials in public. Just because they say things I don't like doesn't mean those officials should be immune from the public.

If you don't want people to talk to you, maybe politician isn't the right job for you.

And I would not be at all surprised if that has happened to both AOC and Sanders more than once and they handled it with grace and aplomb. Do you really think they have security details? Does that sound like Bernie Sanders?

[–] LesserAbe 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I think the people in this thread are focused on speech - you're right that politicians should be available to the public, that they shouldn't be insulated from public sentiment.

What I'm talking about is violence - like January 6. Just because it hasn't happened yet doesn't mean the necessary elements aren't all there. Some people are getting information from crazy sources, completely untethered from reality.

And sure, people aren't supposed to be able to get guns through, but I've accidentally brought knives through security more than once. There's also just plain old physical force. We've seen news stories of people dying from a single punch, maybe their head hits the floor too hard.

[–] FlyingSquid 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If you've accidentally brought weapons through security, that is partially Ted Cruz's fault. He is part of what controls the TSA's budget. Why should he be insulated from the consequences when none of the rest of us are?

Any of us could be a victim of violence at any time. Most people, even very famous people, do not walk around with security details. I know because I used to live in L.A. and saw famous people just walking around plenty of times.

I'm sorry, but this is Ted Cruz just being a coward. On our dime.

[–] LesserAbe 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Ted Cruz is a coward. And maybe that's why he's proposing this. I'm saying regardless of his reasons for proposing it or how shitty he is, I think it's a reasonable policy.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And I'm saying it is not a reasonable policy for someone who controls the TSA's purse strings to not trust them to stop weapons from coming into an airport.

It's his fault it happens. He needs to deal with the consequences if there are any.

And again, this is not a common thing for federal politicians. It simply isn't. Yes, the president and his family have a security detail. But only after a ton of presidents got assassinated. William McKinley got assassinated because Leon Czolgosz just walked up to him and shot him. But back then, we didn't have airports or security screenings. And most senators and congresspeople still don't walk around with a security detail.

Only the cowards.

You mentioned AOC.

AOC got sexually harassed on the capitol steps and does not have a security detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMeF_jwnHMA

Here she is being confronted by angry pro-Palestinian protesters. In public without a security detail. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oMkaJ73D7E

As for Bernie Sanders? Here's BLM protesters getting on the stage with him while he was running for president. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p2iMM7m12zE

Bernie Sanders and AOC are not cowards and are not afraid to be around people who are harassing them in public. Not even when there is no security scanner around.

Ted Cruz is.