this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
127 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
4063 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A full-blown government shutdown may be coming, if reported rumors circulating among top Republican lawmakers are true.

In the power centers amongst the House of Representatives, there is chatter about a temporary stoppage of funding that could throw a wrench in the federal budget, according to a new Axios report.

"People are predicting a shutdown," one GOP lawmaker confided to the news outlet. "Even if it's just for a few days."

Axios learned a subcommittee chair told a fellow House GOP member that members are either "close to reaching a deal or it's about to blow up."

The swirling rumors come months after Congress fended off a similar threat of a government shutdown passing a bill with an 87-11 total to back a temporary funding package.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Ahh good job, it's a good thing that Republicans can't govern. And this will be a good reminder so close to the election.

[–] technicalogical 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t put it past them doing this as a means to mess with the election.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Also, remember: somehow, DeJoy, is still the Postmaster General, despite actively sabotaging the operation of the USPS, both in general, and specifically around handling mail-in-ballots across the country. I’m absolutely floored that Biden hasn’t found some way to evict that fuckstick, because DeJoy is causing ongoing damage to the postal service and election integrity and reliability by continuing to occupy that position.

[–] dhork 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It sounds like DeJoy was never a True Believer after all, but was simply doing what the boss wanted. And when the boss changed, his priorities did, too.

Biden gave DeJoy a lot of direct attention, and as a result he is happily pushing Biden's initiatives. DeJoy is now happy to get a bunch of money invested in his department, even if it is mainly for a new Green initiative. And notice how funding the USPS no longer seems to be a hot potato for conservatives? They don't want to explain how this guy hand-picked by their Messiah can be part of the Deep State now.

To me, this illustrates Biden's skill as a politician, turning a naked political appointment into, if not an ally, certainly someone with shared short-term goals. I hope it doesn't all fall apart when the ballots are in the mail, though.

https://www.politico.com/news/2023/08/13/how-louis-dejoy-went-from-democratic-nightmare-fuel-to-biden-clean-energy-player-00110945

That article even makes the point that this guy would probably work directly against this administration if he were let go, but while he is part of it he will seek to do his job well.

load more comments (5 replies)