this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024
659 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4270 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Trump’s legal team also tried to throw cold water on the idea in a filing earlier this week, writing that the “events of January 6 were not an ‘insurrection’ as they did not involve an organized attempt to overthrow or resist the U.S. government.”

Trump disagrees, apparently.

“They kept saying about what I said right after the insurrection,” he said outside Mar-a-Lago after arguments concluded in Washington, D.C. “I think it was an insurrection caused by Nancy Pelosi.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billiam0202 32 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So the people who were Antifa and MAGA patriots who went to the Capital to peacefully cause an insurrection that was and wasn't a false flag setup by the FBI and "globalists" and are going to prison because of the actions they did and didn't do on Jan 6 were all being led by... Pelosi?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I kind of feel for him. It would be hard to keep track of that many unhinged lies

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No need to keep track, just say whatever you want to say in the moment. Your followers don't care and the media certainly isn't going to call you on it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This post is the media calling him on it. The media has been calling him on his lies as long as I remember. The problem is that his supporters don’t care if he lies.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I suppose, though I'm not sure a lone article in Rolling Stone amounts to much.

I don't hear the media call him on his lies at all, or when they do it's in the same breath as reporting some other lie. It's a huge fucking problem. The media very much plays the game because it gets clicks and views and that = money. Election season has already started, they love it.

That they're still giving him airtime, reporting on his various trials and statements daily. Voicing his responses to the rulings and accusations, amplifying his messaging. It's criminal in itself, the rabid rightwing have one thing right, the "mainstream media" is not our friend. They're corporate owned and are mostly mouthpieces for those corporations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We must have been using different news sources over the last 8-9 years. Hell, there are websites dedicated to just counting his number of lies.

I think it is pretty much common knowledge at this point that whenever he opens his mouth, he is lying.

His base doesn’t care and everyone else is used to it, so headlines like “Donald Trump lied again” are pretty redundant. He is still called out in his lies in most articles that I read though. It’s just not the headline anymore.

I definitely wouldn’t say that reporting on the lead candidate being a jackass is criminal, but you do you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

That link is pay-walled.

I definitely wouldn’t say that reporting on the lead candidate being a jackass is criminal, but you do you.

I'd say giving equal airtime to an insurrectionist fraudster and rapist is pretty borderline. The only time the word Trump is mentioned it should be prefaced by "Proven Criminal and Liar"

edit: here's a non-paywalled version it's a pretty thin article from 3 years ago when Cheeto was still pres. If anything it proves my point, they're still covering all the bullshit he says 3 years later. Stop giving him a platform so his sycophants have to seek out what he says.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

Whatever. I’m not going to argue with a stranger on the internet. Keep your weird beliefs about it being criminal to interview people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Yes, but also he loves them and thinks they're very special.

Does that mean he loves Nanci Pelosi by extension?

[–] suigenerix 3 points 9 months ago

Yep, and before Pelosi, Trump said it was Nikki Haley who caused it.

Man, I just need Trump to blame Taylor Swift for the whole thing, and then my Insurrection-Bingo card will be full!