Science

3238 readers

40 users here now

General discussions about "science" itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:

https://lemmy.ml/c/science

https://beehaw.org/c/science

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

134

Mathematicians Have Found The Ninth Dedekind Number, After 32 Years of Searching (www.sciencealert.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 81 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I looked it up on Wikipedia.

In mathematics, the Dedekind numbers are a rapidly growing sequence of integers named after Richard Dedekind, who defined them in 1897. The Dedekind number M(n) is the number of monotone boolean functions of n variables. Equivalently, it is the number of antichains of subsets of an n-element set, the number of elements in a free distributive lattice with n generators, and one more than the number of abstract simplicial complexes on a set with n elements.

Pretty simple to understand. I mean, I understand it, for sure. Totally.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes, those things, of course.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Glad we cleared that up. In hindsight, it was pretty obvious from the start.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. I know ~~some~~ none of these words.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

I understood most of the words, just the ones that I didn't made the rest incomprehensible garbledygoop

[–] PowerGloveSoBad 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good work everyone. I stay more with the stereo boolean variables, but the news about those lattices being free now is really great stuff. We really did something here

[–] Jackcooper 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

rapidly growing

1 found in 32 years

[–] Pirky 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lol, I thought that at first, but I'm pretty sure it's in how much larger the next number is to the last one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes that's what it means, what is rapidly growing is the value of the next number in the sequence, not the amount of numbers we discovered!

[–] SaakoPaahtaa 2 points 1 year ago

Long slaughtering necromancer math