this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
492 points (78.9% liked)

memes

10482 readers
5238 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doodleschmit 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a little out of the loop on webp. What makes it problematic?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (3 children)

A lot of things don't support it yet, but it's technically a better compression format

[–] Ottomateeverything 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is how every new thing starts though. You don't just get better standards overnight. Jpg and png didn't happen overnight either. PNG had this problem for quite a while.

It's not a problem with WebP. It's a problem with tooling that aren't moving forwards to objectively more effective formats.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Ottomateeverything 1 points 1 year ago

It came out in the past 15 years. Most "common" formats like png and jpg came out in the 90s. Others like tif, bmp, and gif are from the 80s.

So yeah, it is "new", it's just very relative.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yea I have nothing against WebP myself. I also wish HEIC was more widely supported

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

HEIC now has a licensing cost to it, meaning devs have to pay to make their software able to open it. Microsoft recently removed HEIC support from their software because of it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh didn’t know that, that sucks

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Not really though

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

better compression that's often configured wrong by site admins and the quality is shit-tier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] Potatisen 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nope. JPEG XL is more modern and delivers lower file sizes without fucking up image quality as much. Downside is that, right now, JPEG XL is actually supported by even less things, because it is still so new.

But it is an industry standard rather than just Google trying to push its own thing, so I do expect it to overtake WebP in a few years.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

JPEG XL's name sucks, tho. Nothing's perfect.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

just call it JXL like a normal person

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How are we saying that out loud? "Jexel"?

[–] hardaysknight 6 points 1 year ago

If it’s anything like .gif, fuckers will insist on pronouncing it as “Gexel”

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] AlphaOmega 2 points 1 year ago

Is this "the sound you make when you get your sexual organs trapped in something"?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Google dropped support for it in favour of avif, just so they can push their own shit again.