this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)
Philadelphia
481 readers
21 users here now
Welcome to the Philadelphia Lemmy.World community!
Rules:
- This is a community to discuss all things related to Philadelphia. Posts should be relevant to the city or adjacent communities (including the Delaware Valley.
- Keep things civil. Fighting about the best cheesesteak is fine. Spewing insults at other users is not. Trolling is not allowed.
- Don't downvote based on disagreement. Downvotes should be used when people are not contributing to the discussion.
- Follow site-wide rules.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
AI? wtf why?
My best guess as an AI engineer is that the AI is to detect the difference between cars that are parked vs cars on the road that are stopping at a light and then take the picture at the right time.
I don’t think the article says the bus drivers initiate the photos — presumably SEPTA would rather have drivers drive than framing the perfect shot — so it makes sense to have AI fit in there.
Yeah, this is basically just giving an AI pattern recognition service access to camera feeds that are already there. And from what I've read, cars that are flagged at violators will be reviewed by a person before the system actually issues a ticket. If the privacy aspects are handled appropriately (big if there), this is probably going to be a pretty good system, I think.
Yeah normally I’m not a fan of more big brother esque security but given the parking situation in Philly… I’ll shut up and nod.
SEPTA already records pretty much any angle they can to protect from a large number of inane lawsuits.
It’s not “are you recording” but more highlighting what to look at. It would take so many union labor paid hours to sift through all those videos to find a violation. It’s probably cheaper, as crazy as it sounds, to train an AI Model to catch the violations and log it so an employee only has to sift through likely violators.
I also wouldn’t be surprised if the PPA is looking into this model themselves for… other reasons.
Right, not disagreeing, just adding context