this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
-5 points (41.4% liked)

World News

41308 readers
4781 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

How is from the river to the sea antisemitic?

[–] K1nsey6 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not, Palestinians are Semitic. Zionists have conflated anti zionism with being antisemitic. Fuck Zionists

[–] avater 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though 'antisemitism' could be construed as prejudice against people who speak other Semitic languages, this is not how the term is commonly used...

[–] K1nsey6 -1 points 1 year ago

Because Zionists have tried to claim the word as their own

[–] avater 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because it implies that there is no Israel in between.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No Israel or Israeli apartheid, but why conflate that with not letting Jewish people be there?

[–] avater -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Because Jews like to live in Israel? A state granted by the U.N after all the atrocities done to the jewish people...and when groups like Hamas use that term they sure as hell don't want any Jews to live there because you know they're fucking degenerates who want to wipe out jews.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You might want to recheck your history if you think the UN simply granted Jewish people a bunch of Mandatory Palestine because they were sorry about the Holocaust

[–] avater -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In the face of increasing violence after World War II, the British handed the issue over to the recently established United Nations. The result was Resolution 181(II), a plan to partition Palestine into Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem. The Jewish state was to receive around 56% of the land area of Mandate Palestine, encompassing 82% of the Jewish population, though it would be separated from Jerusalem. The result was 33 to 13 in favour of the resolution, with 10 abstentions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_Declaration_of_Independence

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Partition_Plan_for_Palestine

Thats what the U.N is for right, to handle very controverse topics and to find a solution for them. Sorry for the participants of the middle east but thats how a vote works, even if the outcome is not what you expected, but thats democracy.

[–] K1nsey6 -2 points 1 year ago

Jewish belief prohibits the existence of a Jewish state. It wasn't UN land to give away.

[–] AlmightySnoo -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Because like the swastika which went from a cultural Eurasian symbol to what is obviously now a Nazi sign, the "from the river to the sea" is mostly code correlated with antisemitic acts like in the linked article. As you can notice also, Hamas is proudly using the slogan while having called for the complete destruction of Israel in their founding charter while Fatah dropped it altogether.

In 1966, Hafez El-Assad said: "We shall never call for, nor accept peace. We shall only accept war and the restoration of the usurped land. We have resolved to drench this land with our blood, to oust you, aggressors, and throw you into the sea for good."

(https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1994/10/09/the-mind-of-hafez-assad/0be81ae7-2a5a-4e04-bb62-3e527318e317/ )

and that's roughly the period where the slogan came to be.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saying that “from the river to the sea” is antisemitic because a hateful person used some of those words against Israel in the 90’s is tenuous and manufacturing consent. People who want Palestinian self-determination and an end the Israeli apartheid regime are not wild-eyed terrorists who want to wipe out Jewish people. You’re making it look like that.

[–] avater -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But Hamas are terrorists who want to wipe out jewish people...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Hamas ≠ everyone against Israeli apartheid.

Also, if you have a problem with Hamas, then bring it up with Netanyahu. He’s been their biggest booster.

[–] avater -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still they have a fuck ton of supporters...and no their biggest supporters would be the Iran or some religious fucks in Quatar who share their kill all Jews goal.