this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
141 points (92.2% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

5229 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [[email protected]](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A Gargoyles reboot is officially on the way. Months after a report suggested Kenneth Branagh could be helming a live-action reboot of the cult classic animated series, a new trade report says a live-action series is, in fact, in development at Disney+. While it doesn't appear that Branagh is working on it, the series has a pair of monstrous names attached. Gary Dauberman has been hired to write, showrun, and executive produce the series alongside James Wan and his Atomic Monster banner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BroBot9000 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

It’s now a media franchise with it being multiple shows and a comic. Edit: Also a damn video game.

Or I could have use a different word like intellectual property, license or whatever terminology that won’t trigger stupid fans.

What I’m criticizing is the scraping of the barrel for stupid live action adaptations to squeeze any money left from dead IPs.

Enjoy a show or franchise and move on. You don’t have to volunteer to get strapped into the nostalgia money sucking machine every time they resurrect a dead horse to flog.

[–] Huxleywaswrite -1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

So you should be allowed to throw whatever buzzwords you feel like at it? Fuck off, if you can express actual critique for it fine, but just "boo-hoo I hate franchises" is a useless addition to any discussion about it.

[–] BroBot9000 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

A dense little stan aren’t ya. Intellectual property actually means something. It’s not a buzzword. It’s a legal term.

In terms of other criticism. There is literally nothing released. There is no other aspect available to criticize besides it being another property rehashed to milk fanboys.

No trailers with bad cgi and horrible live action character designs, no promo shots of the actors in horrible costumes, no word on Keith David returning.

You’ll get all that criticism and more from this soulless garbage of a cash grab in time. Just like every other fucking dumb remake.

Now stop defending capitalism, run along and play hide and go fuck your self elsewhere.

[–] Huxleywaswrite -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Franchise was the word you're misusing, dumbass. I don't even care about the show. It could be literally be a reboot of anything, but it's not a fucking franchise. Words have meanings.

[–] BroBot9000 1 points 1 year ago

Which I corrected when I clarified in my response. Yet your mong ass doubled down after being told that I meant intellectual property.

It could be a reboot of any IP and it would still be a hollow cash grab to exploit fandoms.

Words have meanings and you’re a fucking imbecile. 

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)