this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2023
787 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
5141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
787
OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series (www.businessinsider.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s to c/technology
371 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

OpenAI now tries to hide that ChatGPT was trained on copyrighted books, including J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter series::A new research paper laid out ways in which AI developers should try and avoid showing LLMs have been trained on copyrighted material.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Touching_Grass 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not in anyways the issue here

[–] scarabic 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of people seem to think it is, constantly conflating the fact that they can read a book at the library with AI being able to do whatever it wants.

[–] Touching_Grass -1 points 1 year ago

I've seen the comment " its not human" like 8 times. They're the only example I see of someone incorrectly conflating things.

People are pointing out the issue with the right to access information freely. Like a library or private property. I am free to do what I want with it including feeding it to a machine I built to train it. Restricting that is wrong