this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1201 points (99.3% liked)

Greentext

5270 readers
3303 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Fortunately, this is easy to work around, just get a VPN hosted in a didn't different state or country.

We have something similar here in Utah, so I have a WiFi network that is always connected to a VPN in a neighboring state. If something isn't accessible, I just swap WiFi networks and I'm good.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So what who cares. VPNs cost money and this is a question of basic freedom.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

There are free VPNs as well, such as Proton's free tier, or Tor. So you've got options.

But yes, I absolutely agree that this shouldn't be necessary. My point is that it's largely unenforceable if you put in a tiny amount of effort.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 hours ago (6 children)
[–] NikkiDimes 2 points 1 hour ago

Accessing it without violating your privacy is the issue, not the cost.

[–] seejur 7 points 2 hours ago

Not sure, but it's very ironic coming from "the land of the free". Every day there is an american coming out in the Internet with the classic "you don't have freedom of speech", and then they have to provide a driving licence for a quickie

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

infinite porn is basic freedom

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

I mean yes? It's just videos of naked people...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

The porn is just the first place they start, their plan is to label anything lgbt as pornographic and require a similar process to view basic educational content. This is how they get around the 1st amendment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 47 minutes ago

Oh yeah I do see the slippery slope of this whole deal, the only thing that irked me was the wording of this comment as if xhamster is a basic human freedom, but I find that a little odd since xhamster and pornhub steal from sex workers to provide it "for free" y'know.

But with the banning of books and trans people unable to get in or out of the country.... It is fucked up and scary.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Seems like it became so, yea

But it's more a question of anonymity / privacy while doing those things

[–] [email protected] 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states. Like, I grew up with piracy, torrents, and old school forums. These educated me on computers enough that I made a career out of it. And most of that computer knowledge was gained because I wanted to see big tittied women sit on each other's faces. These laws don't stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

And this is definitely not one of the cases of "oh it'll reduce numbers overall though". No the fuck it won't. It's porn. They're gonna access it. Literally every YouTuber they watch is sponsored by a VPN.

The only healthy thing to do is actually talking to your kids about porn. Educating them on its potential harms. But Republicans don't ever want to talk to their kids. Ironically, these "drain the swamp" people just want daddy government to "prevent" their kids from accessing it. Which these laws don't do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly, these laws are just gonna hurt old men in Republican states.

You know I think a lot more of their politics and general life outlook makes more sense when you understand that probably a lot of these super old guys are not computer literate enough to look up their niche fetishistic porn interests, and are probably still consuming porn the old fashioned way, which is becoming increasingly nonexistent even though it's still something that actually exists. Plus the propagation of morally puritanical values means that if they kept any of that material around at all, they'd be hypocrites, so they can't have that. Probably a lot of these dudes are walking around super pent up and sexually frustrated, I'd bet.

We need to introduce local community college and library courses to teach these elderly boomers how to goon

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I think your theory is partially correct. But I think it's just as likely they are gooners themselves. I feel like porn addiction (gooning) is more prolific which people that have reactionary beliefs. My theory is that their political leanings are a counter to their actual actions. I don't think the gooner needs "material" to goon to. I think in it's absence it will happen through a Macy's magazine etc.

It's similar almost to priest being the most common pedos. I think these types of conservative/reactionary ideologies just create sexual suppression that manifest in addictive behavior. This is not to say that all conservatives are pedos. But to say that those beliefs combined with sexual suppression often creat these extremes. Whether it be addiction to gooning (outside of their access to goon material) or otherwise.

Idk. I just think that it's an unhealthy relationship with sexuality that any generation can fall pray to. But it's happens more often based on the circumstances of each individual/generation. And it's why it seems to be so extreme in both boomers and recent generations. They both are experiencing extreme economic material conditions/contradictions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

It’s similar almost to priest being the most common pedos.

Pedos tend to aggregate around any job that will give them trusted or unrestricted access to children. The suppression you're talking about in this case isn't just from religion, but permeates all of society. Like, they can't even hypothetically leave the church and move somewhere more liberal where their desire for kid fucking isn't being suppressed. At least not until the weird libertarian crypto-bros who oppose age of consent manage to create such a place.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

These laws don’t stop horny teens from accessing porn. It just makes them better at it.

Exactly. And it punishes the responsible sites that follow the law and drives people to the sketchier sites that don't.

If you want more viruses and identity theft, I guess this is a good law for you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. If these red states actually cared about kids they'd care about proper sex education. But I think this stuff just proves that Republicans are afraid of sex. They had an awkward conversation about it with their dad once and have been leaving their wives unsatisfied for 30 years since. They have no idea what to do if their kid actually came home from school and asked them what the difference between a clitoris and a vagina was. They are absolutely afraid of the female body and it's why they try to control it so much.

Sorry. A bit of a rant. If this was a different conversation I'd have plenty to criticize about the sex industry too. But these conservatives don't have enough brain cells to actually talk about the problems with it. So we have old men making laws that do nothing but make them feel better. Or it's projection for their own porn addiction.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

Column A and Column B for sure