this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025

183 points (100.0% liked)

YUROP

1645 readers

570 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

[email protected]

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

qaz

183

The UN General Assembly has passed a resolution condemning Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, co-sponsored by Kyiv and EU nations, despite the US voting against it and urging other states to do so (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by qaz to c/[email protected]

38 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's a certain demographic of self-described "leftists" who end up being pro-Russia because they are anti-US and see Russia as the opposition to the US.

I'm curious to see if they're able to mentally reconcile a possible geopolitical future where full fash USA and Russia become allies. Are they so pro-Russia that they become pro-USA, or are they so anti-USA they finally become anti-Russia?

Or do they just stick their heads in the ground and pretend like nothing is happening because their US vs Russia worldview cannot support real life geopolitics?

[–] Jesusaurus 9 points 2 days ago

Yes

[–] qaz 3 points 2 days ago

I was wondering the exact same thing

[+] [email protected] -7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There may well be people like you describe, but I see this point of view as exaggerated more often than not. I don't know any leftists that "support" Russia, and certainly not any that think Putin is any kind of good guy. Yes, they view the US as a bigger threat to the world (with very good reason!). They also have a more nuanced view of the geopolitics and history around the war in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The "nuanced view of the geopolitics and history around the war in Ukraine" is usually a lot of mental gymnastics for the sole purpose of defending Russia.

lemmy.ml has a huge pro-Russia bias, for example, my recent comment accusing Russia of being a Nazi country was removed for being "bigoted", another recent comment accusing Israel of being a Nazi country using identical phrasing remained untouched.

You can't have it both ways, saying you don't support Russia while putting in lots of effort to support Russia.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, it's not my experience that such analysis boils down to defending Russia. You don't have to agree with an argument to understand it, and you need to understand it if you don't want to misrepresent it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I do understand the argument, and it lays all accountability for Russia's invasion at the feet of the US, NATO, and Ukraine.

It's the equivalent of blaming Iraq for the US invasion, or blaming Hamas for Israel destroying Gaza. Make sense?

[+] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If Putin came in as a liberator, sure. Instead it became a convenient excuse for the subjugation of Ukrainian people, demoralizing them and terrorizing them with war crimes, so he can annex their land and strip them of natural resources.

The US was heavily involved in overthrowing that government.

Slight reference here to a prominent Russian theory that Ukraine is under US deep state government control. Which is this was true, the US wouldn't looking to switch sides to Russia. And Ukraine wouldn't be so set on continuing to defend itself even if the US switches.

That's why I'm saying, pro-Russia leftists are going to mentally crumble if the US switches over, because their entire world view (the one they like to call their "nuanced geopolitical view") has been ripped apart.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I genuinely believe that a Harris administration would also be looking for an exit at this point. The US has failed to meet most (any?) of its objectives with this proxy war, and is finally admitting it. This is a bitter pill indeed for many people in Ukraine and abroad. The fact is that nothing will turn the tide/retake territory, barring US/NATO intervention. I cannot see that happening no matter who sits in the oval office. Trump is a brash asshole about it, just like everything else, but I think the results will be the same.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I can't argue against anything you said there.

The advantage of a Harris administration is that the US would continue to be unfriendly to Russia, so pro-Russia leftists could continue to believe that Ukraine was just a vassal ruled by US deep state plants, and not have to face the world-shattering reality of a US-Russia alliance against Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think you are grinding your axe too sharply. The US never has anyone's best interest in mind, under any administration. Official US support for Ukraine has never been about freedom, democracy, etc. With that in mind, has the US truly been a friend to the Ukrainian people? They have persisted in prolonging and funding the war well past the point where the prospect of victory had disappeared, at great cost of Ukrainian lives.

Trump is not going to "ally" with Russia. If you call negotiating a peace deal that reflects the relative strength of the Russian position an "alliance" I will have to disagree with you. The worst part of what Trump is doing is extorting Ukraine for the privilege of having suffered for US strategic aims.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Negotiating a peace deal"

Ukraine was not involved in the peace deal, it was Russia and the US alone behind closed doors.

That's not a normal peace deal.

And now Israel is voting in the UN in favor of Russia.

The US, Israel, and Russia are similar countries with similar leaders, similar goals, similar methods. Unless we actually see one of the three experience an internal revolution, an alliance is inevitable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago

Ukraine has no leverage to broker any kind of peace. If the US totally cuts off military aid to Ukraine, they cannot hold against Russia. Thus the reality is revealed: this is a proxy war for the US. I know this hurts and is very unfair to Ukrainians, but it just is what it is. Sure, Ukraine can ignore the results of any negotiation, but it will continue the fight without US support-- a fight it has been slowly losing even with that support.

Israel votes with the US on things like this in exchange for US always voting to protect Israel from any censure.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If Russia and the US form a coalition they probably just stop supporting Russia no? This isn't a team sport

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

After years of defending Russian war crimes I don't think they'll find it all that easy to "just stop supporting Russia".

Like are they suddenly going to admit that Russia was commiting atrocities the entire time, or pretend the atrocities only started with the influence of their US ally, or just go silent on everything?