this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
560 points (97.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

5914 readers
6492 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] namarupa 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Could you help me understand where his argument is specious?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

His primary argument was all about lifetime earning potential. That is not what salary refers to. So, his argument doesn't actually apply to the allegation. Therefore, it is specious.

[–] namarupa 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I can't see where his argument was about lifetime earning potential. Seems to be just simply women with children make less money, which seems reasonable.

I also don't see anywhere he even implied that salary and lifetime earning potential were the same thing. And salary would be reflected in lifetime earning potential.

What is your position? I'm not even certain what the point of your disagreement is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

And all was well in the fediverse

Hopefully the deleted commenter doesn’t see this but if you do thank you!

[–] WhatAmLemmy 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I have come to the conclusion that their position is mental illness, because everything they've typed so far is non-sensical.