this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)
World News
267 readers
1029 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The fact you stop working and start protesting does not magically lower the prices of food. That’s unfortunately not the way the world works.
I see this is difficult to comprehend.
What does hurting the production owner's income do?
When you hurt the production owner’s income, they have to cut costs. One of the way to do it is to lay of employees.
That's an option. People generally put their jobs directly at risk when they don't have much other opportunity for improvement. Do you know something they don't?
If enough people refuse to return to work, output shrinks, never mind the damaged reputation of the company. And reputation counts, would you work at Walmart expecting a positive experience? Shrunken output means purchasers will start looking elsewhere to meet their needs, further damaging that employer.
Scale it up to a state level. Things get much more complex, the web of supply/demand gets both more complex... But also provides more options. This protest is likely going to get officials to look into things like self-sufficiency where possible vs import, considerations of how to better apply taxes to keep said officials out of jeopardy, and so on.
None of this is simple, nor are solutions straightforward. My point, and worker's in general, is that people want to be able to afford basic staples for a fair amount of work, and if the people aren't getting their end of the bargain, the "owners" have very limited time to get with the program or things will change.