this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
108 points (90.3% liked)
Videos
14346 readers
260 users here now
For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!
Rules
- Videos only
- Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
- Don't be a jerk
- No advertising
- No political videos, post those to [email protected] instead.
- Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
- Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
- Duplicate posts may be removed
Note: bans may apply to both [email protected] and [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I think the officials overreacted, I understand that rabies is a nasty fatal disease. But the euthanasia is completely unnecessary. The officials say it's to determine that the animals don't have rabies after peanut bit one of them. If the animals turned out negative for rabies then it means no danger, if positive the only thing they can do is vaccinate the worker, there's nothing else they can do but wait. Why not just vaccinate the worker and let the animals live?
Also sheltered animals are in no danger of having rabies unless they are bitten by a rabid animal outside.
You cant test for rabies without euthanasing the animal.
"...to rule out rabies, the test must include a full cross-section of tissue from both the brain stem and cerebellum." - https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/php/laboratories/diagnostic.html
He had just taken in a raccoon so the squirrel could have gotten it from that, and they don't know if the owner had been lying about taking it outside.
This is all the owner's fault for not taking the squirrel to a proper animal sanctuary.
Let me ask you this. If the animal is tested as rabid. What's the next step for the bitten?
If a animal is tested positive the human have to undergo about 2-4 vaccinations that might need to be repeated and will cost a great amount, or they die. The vaccination has a lot of side effects.
It doesn’t have any more potential side effects than any other vaccine. It’s not special in this regard.
So the euthanasia step is really not needed and just go straight to the vaccination part.
Sure, that makes sense for a country with socialized health care. You still shouldn't keep wild animals as pets.
Hmmm, in my country rabies vaccine cost more or less $20 a jab.
Still what they did was PETA level cruel.
Yeah, well in the US of A it costs up to 500 dollars per shot, and you need at least four.
I blame P'nut's death on the owner.
Consise and correct information. Thanks for sharing and explaining the reasoning for the actions taken.
Nah, I blame the Karen that reported the Instagram account. Peanut would still be alive if not for her envy that peanut has more followers than her.
Sure, blame the woman.
Yeah, because she's a meddling little bitch.
he had the thing for 7 years. if it had rabies it would have died already.