this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
49 points (90.2% liked)
World News
420 readers
684 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
50% of the population suffers 40% of the loss.
This point falls apart when you consider how it's usually men fighting. Ideally it'd be 100% combatants, which would result in 90%< men. Of course men can also be civilians, but you'd still expect the ratio to lean a bit more than that towards men.
Sure, but in the article they are talking specifically about civilian deaths. So combatants aren't counted here.
Yeah fair enough. The article contradicts itself on that point but that would make more sense.