this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
268 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18936 readers
2754 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democrats were fooled by their social media echo chamber in 2016. Now Republicans may be falling into the same trap

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 154 points 4 days ago (2 children)

“Democrats were fooled by their social media echo chamber” is an interesting way to spell “an inherently anti-democratic institution set up to make some voters worth more than others elected the candidate with fewer votes.”

[–] [email protected] 23 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Probably more accurate to say "Democrats fooled themselves with their social media echo chamber" and really only if you are referring to the national Democratic Party and groups like Correct the Record. Doesn't really apply to the voters or state-level Dems.

The Clintons and using media to "massage" the message goes back to the '92 election and using satellite feeds back to the campaign headquarters in Arkansas to do things like communicate with their campaign team on the ground at events to say "Hey, can you pan the camera to the right just a little bit, then the protestors won't be in the frame." This is well documented by the 90's documentary film Spin.

So Clinton signed up to use Correct the Record to massage the message on the internet, fooling themselves into thinking that was enough. It's also why we've seen very little progress on making laws to force paid political operatives to have to state that they're paid advertisements online, because both parties participate in this practice and don't want to stop. Which is part of why its hard to stop other nation-state actors from doing it as well, because we won't even criminalize it in our own political parties. It makes no sense that a political ad on television must disclose its funding and who endorses it, but when it's a sockpuppet online it's a fucking free-for-all.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

the real insanity is that your excellent observations are being downvoted.

people just have to create their preferred echo chamber any where they are and we all suffer for it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Exactly. So many peoplev still trying to analyze what the Democrats did wrong in an election they won 🙄.

[–] linearchaos 7 points 3 days ago

To be fair we did win, But it was only because It wasn't by a narrow margin. There's enough wrong right now that if we had a true 50-50 race there's no way we'd win it. And that needs to be fixed. We've got swing states with openly corrupt voting management. DeJoy is trying to f*** over the mail, he ripped out the sorting machines last time to try to slow things down and he's trying to slow it down again. You're still going to have voting sections in poor sections of town moved miles away, you're still going to have people arrested for bringing people water who are standing in really long lines.

Yeah, we're still looking at things for an election we won because things are still pretty f***** up