Spaceflight

640 readers

116 users here now

Your one-stop shop for spaceflight news and discussion.

All serious posts related to spaceflight are welcome! JAXA, ISRO, CNSA, Roscosmos, ULA, RocketLab, Firefly, Relativity, Blue Origin, etc. (Arca and Pythom, if you must).

Other related space communities:

Related meme community:

[email protected]

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

llamacoffee

Companies describe studies to revise Mars Sample Return (spacenews.com)

submitted 3 months ago by llamacoffee to c/[email protected]

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

He cited a case where the sample canister, rather than sent on an Earth entry trajectory to make a hard landing in the Utah desert, would instead be transferred to a spaceplane to return to Earth on a runway, subjected to far lower g-forces. “If we can reduce the g-loading on the sample canister colliding with the surface of Utah,” he said, “the sample canister can get lighter and everything upstream gets easier and better.”

What spaceplane would be used? Dream Chaser? A new custom vehicle? Starship isn't really a spaceplane, but it might be able to offer a similar lower-g option.

[–] bcoffy 6 points 3 months ago (5 children)

If they’re going to “transfer to a space plane”, that to me sounds like a LEO rendezvous, so at that point why not just rendezvous with a crew/cargo dragon instead of designing a brand new spaceplane?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

In order to get the samples inside Dragon, they would either need to bring a docking adapter or depressurize the cabin a la Polaris Dawn. Both options seem like a bit much, like using a limousine to transport packages. That being said, I'm not sure Dream Chaser has any unpressurized return capabilities either.

I've just remembered of another existing spaceplane. The X-37B has a 2.1 × 1.2 m payload bay, and a capacity of 227 kg. Would the military let NASA borrow one?

[–] bcoffy 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Good point, actually the X-37B would make a lot of sense: it’s uncrewed, can obviously be up for a long period of time (years), and can go to pretty high orbits as well on a Falcon Heavy, plus it has an arm right? So it’d just be a question of getting the USSF on board

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

it has an arm right?

Does it? I haven't seen many detailed photos of it. I wouldn't be surprised if it did though.

[–] bcoffy 2 points 3 months ago

I did some research and couldn’t find any evidence that it does. That could be a capability that the Space Force doesn’t want to be public though

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (3 replies)