this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
91 points (96.9% liked)

Data is Beautiful

852 readers
36 users here now

Be respectful

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Source of data: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/T0HSJ1

Edit: removed OC as it's not (sorry)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I might miss the point, but the height is dependent on both parents genetically, so just comparing mothers with daughters is a bit like the usual "correlation does not equal causation" thingie, or not?

[–] tehevilone 16 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The X and Y are just labeled weird, both graphs reference father's height has the X and mother's height as the Y

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, but there is no graph comparing son vs mother and daughter vs father.

And it seems like an odd thing to omit.

[–] tehevilone 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

If I'm reading the referenced link right, the data is from 1886(?), so it's not terribly recent, either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Wow, thanks for checking on that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

yes, 928 children and 205 parents it seems.

wonder how the trend shown here has changed in almost 150 years...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)