this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2024
87 points (93.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9700 readers
2011 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] breadsmasher 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Have had them for ages

Ive seen Volvo lorries with that, nothing else.

What cars are you seeing that have what the article is discussing, already implemented?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know if they meet all the requirements of this law, but I’ve seen Subarus, BMWs, and a Porsche that all had some form of automatic braking.

I think the Porsche was the oldest, around 2015-2016. It could keep even keep pace with the car in front of you

[–] breadsmasher 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Current implementation clearly doesn’t meet the defined regulatory changes in the main article.

Not sure it’s really relevant

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Precedent set by older, and very similar, technology seems pretty relevant if we’re talking about liability

[–] breadsmasher -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I think we are talking on similar, but not the same, situation.

In your case, absolutely you cannot rely on the car 100% to brake and its your liability.

But when cars are mandated to have some very specific technology, which will require the driver to get used to etc.

What if that technology fails? IE like Tesla autopilot at the moment. The more vehicles are regulated to have “self control” on braking etc even up to self driving, at what point does liability shift from the driver to the manufacturer?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

At no point would or should the liability shift. Even in the case of autopilot. The driver still remains in complete control of the vehicle and it is their responsibility to not crash it. These automatic braking systems kick in at the last possible second. Things are already pretty bad if they are doing their job

[–] Maggoty 1 points 5 months ago

It's been in my last 3 cars and they weren't luxury vehicles. They were low 20k Honda, Toyota, and Nissan.

[–] Cort 1 points 5 months ago

Most manufacturers have these types of systems but none are up to the new standard. They're often called forward collision warning/avoidance systems.