this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2024
-19 points (19.4% liked)

Conservative

362 readers
124 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

I know a family trying to take a three week vacation to the US. They applied for a visa. They need to do an interview to get the visa. The interview is scheduled a year and a half from the day they applied and is on a random weekday in a city 8 hours from where they live. They don't live in the middle of nowhere, they live in a huge city with a population of over 15 million.

They applied in 2023. Is this considered letting everyone in?

I have a coworker who's here on a work visa. He has a master's degree and works in a high demand field, making over 200k a year. His visa renewal was rejected and he has to leave in a few months. Do you consider this letting everyone in?

What's your reasoning for thinking that he lets everyone in?

[–] [email protected] -5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is that they're trying to do it legally.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

https://trac.syr.edu/immigration/detentionstats/pop_agen_table.html

38000 ppl currently detained by ice and cbp for illegal border crossing. That's a lot of ppl not being let in.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thats magnitudes less than the millions Border Patrol catches and releases every year. https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/southwest-land-border-encounters

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That's millions by year and my statistic is for a month. Looks like your statistic shows 170k encounters for the most recent month which is what we should compare to the 38k detained.

That's roughly just under a quarter of encounters getting detained. Being encountered but not detained doesn't mean they are let into the US. They get sent back. Detaining people costs more money than sending people back.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago

No, theyre detained for a little bit and released into the US